BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18524069)

  • 1. Constitutional law--substantive due process--en banc D.C. Circuit rejects fundamental right to experimental medications.--Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007)(en banc), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1069 (2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 121(6):1685-92. PubMed ID: 18524069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study in futility: Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs will not expand access to experimental drugs for the terminally ill.
    Ochs A
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(2):559-603. PubMed ID: 19462540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual patient treatment use of unapproved drugs: a new option for the seriously ill.
    Simon LS; Green A
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2010 Mar; 24(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 20345195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The proper focus for FDA regulations: why the fundamental right to self-preservation should allow terminally ill patients with no treatment options to attempt to save their lives.
    Puckett A
    SMU Law Rev; 2007; 60(2):635-65. PubMed ID: 17849632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expanding access to investigational drugs for treatment use: a policy analysis and legislative proposal.
    Winniford A
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2009; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 19459546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new era of unapproved drugs: the case of Abigail Alliance v Von Eschenbach.
    Jacobson PD; Parmet WE
    JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 17213404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abigail Alliance v. Von Eschenbach: restricting access to potentially lifesaving drugs singe 2007.
    Goodman AJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2008; 25(1):107-41. PubMed ID: 19137749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right to try?
    Lieu CH; Sorkin A; Messersmith WA
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 33(13):1518. PubMed ID: 25779561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Charging for investigational drugs under an investigational new drug application. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(155):40871-900. PubMed ID: 19691172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criminal procedure--substantive due process--D.C. Circuit holds that the government may forcibly treat incompetent criminal defendants with antipsychotic medication to render them competent to stand trial. --United States v. Weston, 255 F.3d 873 (D.C. Cir. 2001), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Sept. 5, 2001) (No. 01-6161).
    Harv Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 115(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 11958231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanded access to investigational drugs for treatment use. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(155):40900-45. PubMed ID: 19691173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law -- free exercise clause -- Ninth Circuit rejects strict scrutiny for pharmacy dispensing requirement. -- Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 Dec; 123(2):596-603. PubMed ID: 20196268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health care law--Medicaid--Third Circuit finds providers lack standing to enforce the Medicaid Act.--Pennsylvania Pharmacists Ass'n v. Houstoun, 283 F.3d 531 (3d Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 123 S.Ct. 100 (2002).
    Harv Law Rev; 2003 Jan; 116(3):969-76. PubMed ID: 12530442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right of access of the medically underserved to health care services.
    Brandin PA
    J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):297-345. PubMed ID: 6976402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expanding access to investigational new therapies.
    Cohen C; Shevitz A; Mayer K
    Prim Care; 1992 Mar; 19(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 1594704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right to experimental treatment: FDA new drug approval, constitutional rights, and the public's health.
    Leonard EW
    J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 19493072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beneficial and unusual punishment: an argument in support of prisoner participation in clinical trials.
    Hoffman S
    Indiana Law Rev; 2000; 33(2):475-515. PubMed ID: 16189915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical, legal, and ethical issues in expanded access to investigational drugs.
    Darrow JJ; Sarpatwari A; Avorn J; Kesselheim AS
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Jan; 372(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 25587952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expanded access to Phase II clinical trials in oncology: a step toward increasing scientific validity and compassion.
    Marcee AK
    Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(2):439-57. PubMed ID: 18561471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minnesota's Right to Try law.
    Hermer LD
    Minn Med; 2016; 99(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 26897894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.