These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18524206)

  • 1. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses: an early 20th century contribution.
    Rudy RJ; Levi PA; Bonacci FJ; Weisgold AS; Engler-Hamm D
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 May; 29(4):220-2, 224, 226-8 passim. PubMed ID: 18524206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. History of immediate load in implant dentistry. Interview.
    Rosenlicht JL
    Dent Implantol Update; 2004 Oct; 15(10):73-9. PubMed ID: 15503520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of osseointegrated implants as an adjunct and alternative to conventional periodontal prosthesis.
    Liu CL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Sep; 26(9):653-4, 656, 659-60 passim; quiz 668-9. PubMed ID: 16206821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fifty Years of Dental Implant Development: a Continuous Evolution.
    Darcey J; Eldridge D
    Dent Hist; 2016 Jul; 61(2):75-92. PubMed ID: 29894046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions.
    Buser D; Sennerby L; De Bruyn H
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 28000280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate loading of endosseous implants is not new.
    Linkow LI; Miller RJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 15587022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moderately roughened- and roughened-surface implants used as rigid orthodontic anchorage: a case series.
    Kato S; Kato M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 16774594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early functional loading using Brånemark dental implants.
    Ericsson I; Nilner K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Feb; 22(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 11922224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
    Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
    Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 18783415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
    Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-pinning: the philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant-supported prostheses.
    Gervais MJ; Hatzipanagiotis P; Wilson PR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 18304245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark system implants in edentulous mandibles: clinical report of the results of developmental and simplified protocols.
    Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ; Rangert B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 12705304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
    Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate loading of Brånemark System Implants: a comparison between TiUnite and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible.
    Fröberg KK; Lindh C; Ericsson I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 17100744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles.
    Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.