These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [A study on the standard and evaluation of facial photographs in children]. Miura K Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1987 Jun; 19(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 3505543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of melanocytic naevi with photographs, a recommended method. Marks R Br J Dermatol; 2003 Feb; 148(2):365. PubMed ID: 12588398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Preparing effective illustrations. Part 2: photographs, images and diagrams. Ng KH; Peh WC Singapore Med J; 2009 Apr; 50(4):330-4; quiz 335. PubMed ID: 19421674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Professional practice forum: photographs and videotapes. Manny B J AHIMA; 1992 Dec; 63(12):24-6. PubMed ID: 10123117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Standardization in dental photography. Bengel W Int Dent J; 1985 Sep; 35(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 3863799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Method of esthetic evaluation of the reconstructed breast after cancer. Report of 76 cases]. Fontet P; Schwarz J; Revol M; Banzet P; Servant JM Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1998 Jun; 43(3):217-21; discussion 222-3. PubMed ID: 9768063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Standardized fields in routine ocular fundus photography with a new eye-piece graticule. Parr JC Med Biol Illus; 1973 May; 23(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 4729100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Standardized Photographic Documentation of Hidradenitis Suppurativa/Acne Inversa. Zouboulis CC; Nogueira da Costa A Dermatology; 2019; 235(1):51-54. PubMed ID: 30368496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Female plastic surgery patients prefer mirror-reversed photographs of themselves: A prospective study. de Runz A; Boccara D; Chaouat M; Locatelli K; Bertheuil N; Claudot F; Bekara F; Mimoun M J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Jan; 69(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 26428387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reading and writing direction effects on the aesthetic appreciation of photographs. Chahboun S; Flumini A; Pérez González C; McManus IC; Santiago J Laterality; 2017 May; 22(3):313-339. PubMed ID: 27294864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Rainbow Scale for Assessing Breast Ptosis: Validation of Three Different Views. Eyck BM; van Dongen JA; Athanassopoulos T; Bastos Martins J; Stevens HP Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Oct; 36(9):1010-6. PubMed ID: 27485092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy? Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. Heil J; Carolus A; Dahlkamp J; Golatta M; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Blumenstein M; Rauch G; Sohn C Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 21852135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dental photograph standardization for case documentation. Antonelli JR Compendium; 1991 Jul; 12(7):504, 506-11. PubMed ID: 1802399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Children's aesthetic understanding of photographic art and the quality of art-related parent-child interactions. Szechter LE; Liben LS Child Dev; 2007; 78(3):879-94. PubMed ID: 17517010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]