185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18529187)
1. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
Balakrishnan U; Freyman RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.
Freyman RL; Helfer KS; Balakrishnan U
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17348526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2112-22. PubMed ID: 11386563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
Yost WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
Chen J; Li H; Li L; Wu X; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.
Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB
Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11951851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech.
Wu X; Wang C; Chen J; Qu H; Li W; Wu Y; Schneider BA; Li L
Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of Masked Speech Detection Thresholds in 2- to 15-year-old Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Bonino AY; Ramsey ME; Pancoast ES; Vance EA
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1712-1726. PubMed ID: 33928913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
