BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18529194)

  • 1. What marks the beat of speech?
    Kochanski G; Orphanidou C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2780-91. PubMed ID: 18529194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compensatory responses to loudness-shifted voice feedback during production of Mandarin speech.
    Liu H; Zhang Q; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2405-12. PubMed ID: 17902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Dependence of 'audio-phonatoric coupling' of speech rate and speech loudness].
    Jäncke L
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):581-97. PubMed ID: 1295272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. F0-based rhythm effects on the perception of local syllable prominence.
    Niebuhr O
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):95-112. PubMed ID: 19390233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do rhythm measures reflect perceived rhythm?
    Barry W; Andreeva B; Koreman J
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):78-94. PubMed ID: 19390232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rhythmic patterning in Malaysian and Singapore English.
    Tan RS; Low EL
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):196-214. PubMed ID: 25102606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception of prominence patterns.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(4):257-69. PubMed ID: 19221454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived loudness of speech based on the characteristics of glottal excitation source.
    Seshadri G; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2061-71. PubMed ID: 19813815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech.
    Warner N; Tucker BV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1606-17. PubMed ID: 21895098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence.
    Ghitza O; Greenberg S
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):113-26. PubMed ID: 19390234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of prosodic prominence and serial position on duration perception.
    Zheng X; Pierrehumbert JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):851-9. PubMed ID: 20707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship of vocal loudness manipulation to prosodic F0 and durational variables in healthy adults.
    Watson PJ; Hughes D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 16787901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contribution of phonation type to the perception of vocal emotions in German: an articulatory synthesis study.
    Birkholz P; Martin L; Willmes K; Kröger BJ; Neuschaefer-Rube C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1503-12. PubMed ID: 25786961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phonetic applications of the time-corrected instantaneous frequency spectrogram.
    Fulop SA
    Phonetica; 2007; 64(4):237-62. PubMed ID: 18421245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of syllable frequency in speech production.
    Cholin J; Levelt WJ; Schiller NO
    Cognition; 2006 Mar; 99(2):205-35. PubMed ID: 15939415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rhythmic versus phonemic interference in delayed auditory feedback.
    Kaspar K; Rübeling H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):932-43. PubMed ID: 20966383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little.
    Kochanski G; Grabe E; Coleman J; Rosner B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1038-54. PubMed ID: 16158659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of lung volume initiation on speech: a perceptual study.
    Milstein CF; Watson PJ
    J Voice; 2004 Mar; 18(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 15070222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the effects of Voice Massage and voice hygiene lecture on self-reported vocal well-being and acoustic and perceptual speech parameters in female teachers.
    Leppänen K; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 19590222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rhythm in speech and language: a new research paradigm.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):29-45. PubMed ID: 19390229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.