146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18529747)
1. Sub-harmonic response from polymer-shelled contrast agents with a 40-MHz excitation.
Ketterling JA; Mamou J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):3110. PubMed ID: 18529747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subharmonic analysis using singular-value decomposition of ultrasound contrast agents.
Mamou J; Ketterling JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4078-91. PubMed ID: 19507989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies.
Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonlinear emission from individual bound microbubbles at high frequencies.
Sprague MR; Chérin E; Goertz DE; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-24. PubMed ID: 20018429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound.
Ketterling JA; Mamou J; Allen JS; Aristizábal O; Williamson RG; Turnbull DH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):EL48-53. PubMed ID: 17297826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.
Chitnis PV; Koppolu S; Mamou J; Chlon C; Ketterling JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 23287913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions.
Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Leodore LM; Eisenbrey JR; Park S; Hall AL; Thomenius K; Forsberg F
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Jul; 33(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 21842580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ambient Pressure Sensitivity of the Subharmonic Response of Coated Microbubbles: Effects of Acoustic Excitation Parameters.
Azami RH; Forsberg F; Eisenbrey JR; Sarkar K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 37100673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing of subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents to determine ambient pressures.
Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Eisenbrey JR; Forsberg F
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Apr; 34(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 22724314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subharmonic Response of Polymer Contrast Agents Based on the Empirical Mode Decomposition.
Hayashi R; Allen JS; Chitnis PV; Mamou J; Ketterling JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2107-2113. PubMed ID: 27913328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.
Shekhar H; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082903. PubMed ID: 23927358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents.
Bloch SH; Short RE; Ferrara KW; Wisner ER
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 15749568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles.
Shi WT; Forsberg F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jan; 26(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 10687797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Pulse Shaping on Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.
Gupta I; Eisenbrey J; Stanczak M; Sridharan A; Dave JK; Liu JB; Hazard C; Wang X; Wang P; Li H; Wallace K; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 27943411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro study of a microbubble contrast agent using a clinical ultrasound imaging system.
Sboros V; Moran CM; Pye SD; McDicken WN
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(1):159-73. PubMed ID: 14971779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.
Shekhar H; Awuor I; Thomas K; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):727-38. PubMed ID: 24582298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Filling Gas on Subharmonic Emissions of Phospholipid Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Kanbar E; Fouan D; Sennoga CA; Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):1004-1015. PubMed ID: 28214036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The response of phospholipid-encapsulated microbubbles to chirp-coded excitation: implications for high-frequency nonlinear imaging.
Shekhar H; Doyley MM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3145-58. PubMed ID: 23654417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
