156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18532966)
1. Triage of ovarian masses.
Chia YN; Marsden DE; Robertson G; Hacker NF
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jun; 48(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 18532966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index.
Enakpene CA; Omigbodun AO; Goecke TW; Odukogbe AT; Beckmann MW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 19215560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Triaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group protocol.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Valentin L; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Testa AC; Vergote I; Bourne T
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):662-71. PubMed ID: 22390753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors.
Yarandi F; Eftekhar Z; Izadi-Mood N; Shojaei H
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Aug; 48(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18837853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of adnexal masses.
Leng JH; Lang JH; Zhang JJ; Feng FZ; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Zhu L; Zhao XY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Feb; 119(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 16537005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of malignancy index used as a diagnostic tool in a tertiary centre for patients with a pelvic mass.
Håkansson F; Høgdall EV; Nedergaard L; Lundvall L; Engelholm SA; Pedersen AT; Hartwell D; Høgdall C;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Apr; 91(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 22229703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of intraoperative frozen sections in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors.
Wasinghon P; Suthippintawong C; Tuipae S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Dec; 91(12):1791-5. PubMed ID: 19133510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ovarian fibroma/fibrothecoma: retrospective cohort study shows limited value of risk of malignancy index score.
Numanoglu C; Kuru O; Sakinci M; Akbayır O; Ulker V
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 53(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 23611791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices in evaluating ovarian masses in a Southeast Asian population.
Ong C; Biswas A; Choolani M; Low JJ
Singapore Med J; 2013 Mar; 54(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23546025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in diagnosis of ovarian malignancy.
Moolthiya W; Yuenyao P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(5):865-8. PubMed ID: 20162854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of malignancy index for referral of ovarian cancer cases to a tertiary center: does it identify the correct cases?
Bailey J; Tailor A; Naik R; Lopes A; Godfrey K; Hatem HM; Monaghan J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16 Suppl 1():30-4. PubMed ID: 16515564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved Detection Rate of Ovarian Cancer Using a 2-Step Triage Model of the Risk of Malignancy Index and Expert Sonography in an Outpatient Screening Setting.
Manegold-Brauer G; Buechel J; Knipprath-Mészaros A; Schoetzau A; Hacker NF; Tercanli S; Lapaire O; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jul; 26(6):1062-9. PubMed ID: 27177281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distinguishing benign and malignant pelvic masses: the value of different diagnostic methods in everyday clinical practice.
Engelen MJ; Bongaerts AH; Sluiter WJ; de Haan HH; Bogchelman DH; Tenvergert EM; Willemse PH; van der Zee AG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 17118522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of parity to the risk of malignancy index score in evaluating adnexal masses.
Yavuzcan A; Çağlar M; Özgü E; Üstün Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Güngör T; Kumru S
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 25510694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Morgante G; la Marca A; Ditto A; De Leo V
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jun; 106(6):524-7. PubMed ID: 10426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of frozen section (intraoperative consultation) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Ilvan S; Ramazanoglu R; Ulker Akyildiz E; Calay Z; Bese T; Oruc N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):395-9. PubMed ID: 15863135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The risk-of-malignancy index to evaluate potential ovarian cancers in local hospitals.
Tingulstad S; Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE; Halvorsen T; Nustad K; Onsrud M
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Mar; 93(3):448-52. PubMed ID: 10074998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: sequential use of the risk of malignancy index and HistoScanning, a novel computer-aided diagnostic tool.
Vaes E; Manchanda R; Autier P; Nir R; Nir D; Bleiberg H; Robert A; Menon U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 39(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21695741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
