182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18533395)
1. Ultrasound detection of nonpalpable mammographically occult malignancy.
Simpson WL; Hermann G; Rausch DR; Sherman J; Feig SA; Bleiweiss IJ; Jaffer S; Port A
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2008 Apr; 59(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 18533395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Girardi V; Carbognin G; Camera L; Baglio I; Bucci A; Bonetti F; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1226-38. PubMed ID: 21744256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer.
Rissanen TJ; Mäkäräinen HP; Apaja-Sarkkinen MA; Lindholm EL
Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 7619612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy in palpable and non-palpable breast lesions.
Pijnappel RM; van Dalen A; Borel Rinkes IH; van den Tweel JG; Mali WP
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 9097053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
Shetty MK; Shah YP; Sharman RS
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):263-8; quiz 269-70. PubMed ID: 12636326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic imaging of lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, ultrasonographic and MR findings].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Smania S
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 11307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer.
Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 12646427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.
Butler RS; Venta LA; Wiley EL; Ellis RL; Dempsey PJ; Rubin E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 9930776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonography of palpable breast cancer.
Georgian-Smith D; Taylor KJ; Madjar H; Goldberg B; Merritt CR; Bokobsa J; Rubin E; Mendelson EB; Fornage BD; Rouse G; Wadden NA; Dewbury KC; Cosgrove DO; Schmidt R
J Clin Ultrasound; 2000 Jun; 28(5):211-6. PubMed ID: 10799998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography.
Greene T; Cocilovo C; Estabrook A; Chinitz L; Giuliano C; Rosenbaum Smith S; Tartter PI
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):894-8. PubMed ID: 17116558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes].
Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic core biopsy in a mammographic breast cancer screening programme.
Dahlstrom JE; Jain S; Sutton T; Sutton S
Histopathology; 1996 May; 28(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 8735717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with palpable breast abnormalities and negative mammographic and sonographic findings.
Yalniz C; Campbell D; Le-Petross C; Shin K; Bevers TB; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 32108973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
