These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Subjective and objective voice assessment following partial resection of the larynx]. Ptok M; de Maddalena H Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Jul; 69(7):356-9. PubMed ID: 2244949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia. Awan SN; Roy N J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):268-82. PubMed ID: 15907441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcome of laryngeal manual therapy in four Dutch adults with persistent moderate-to-severe vocal hyperfunction: a pilot study. Van Lierde KM; De Ley S; Clement G; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 15567048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A longitudinal study of voice before and after phonosurgery for removal of a polyp. Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Zrinski KV Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(10-11):857-63. PubMed ID: 18608247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Representation of the vocal roughness of aperiodic speech sounds in the auditory cortex. Yrttiaho S; Alku P; May PJ; Tiitinen H J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3177-85. PubMed ID: 19425660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Application of voice acoustic analysis in microlaryngoscopic surgery]. Zhu Z; Wang Y; Chen W; Chen R Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Mar; 15(3):118-9. PubMed ID: 12541680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. Chan KM; Yiu EM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 14748643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evolution of voice assessment and quality of life after endoscopic laser cordectomy]. Crevier-Buchman L; Colomb I; Hans S; Vaissière J; Brasnu D Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 20387377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Voice profile after type I or II laser chordectomies for T1a glottic carcinoma. Sjögren EV; van Rossum MA; Langeveld TP; Voerman MS; van de Kamp VA; Baatenburg de Jong RJ Head Neck; 2009 Nov; 31(11):1502-10. PubMed ID: 19431198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of the macroscopic features of vocal fold polyps on the quality of voice: a retrospective review of 101 cases. Dursun G; Karatayli-Ozgursoy S; Ozgursoy OB; Tezcaner ZC; Coruh I; Kilic MA Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Mar; 89(3):E12-7. PubMed ID: 20229464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Registration of the vocal field for the clinical assessment of voice]. Shyupshinskene N; Uloza V Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1997; (4):31-3. PubMed ID: 9334013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Functional analysis of voice using simultaneous high-speed imaging and acoustic recordings. Yan Y; Damrose E; Bless D J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 16968665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of voice acquisition methodologies in speech research. Vogel AP; Maruff P Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):982-7. PubMed ID: 19001389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomical and functional correlates of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech. van As-Brooks CJ; Hilgers FJ; Koopmans-van Beinum FJ; Pols LC J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 15936923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]