These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534105)
21. Less is more: subjective detailedness depends on stimulus size. Heinrich SP; Bach M J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):2. PubMed ID: 20884467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fuzzy picture processing: effects of size reduction and blurring on emotional processing. De Cesarei A; Codispoti M Emotion; 2008 Jun; 8(3):352-63. PubMed ID: 18540751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The incomplete angler: effects created by visual omission. Findlay JM Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):271-2. PubMed ID: 18534103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli. Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implicit and explicit features of paintings. Marković S; Radonjić A Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):229-59. PubMed ID: 18534101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization. Collin CA; McMullen PA Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):354-64. PubMed ID: 15971697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Recognition of halftone and contour figures under their lateralization and masking]. Kamenkovich VM; Shevelev IA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 18666568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Attentional vs computational complexity measures in observing paintings. Cardaci M; Di Gesù V; Petrou M; Tabacchi ME Spat Vis; 2009; 22(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 19460272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mondrian, eye movements, and the oblique effect. Plumhoff JE; Schirillo JA Perception; 2009; 38(5):719-31. PubMed ID: 19662947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spatial frequency components influence cell activity in the inferotemporal cortex. Bermudez MA; Vicente AF; Romero MC; Perez R; Gonzalez F Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 19804657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task. van Dijck JP; Gevers W; Fias W Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 19726035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Personality and preference for painting style. Juhasz JB; Paxson L Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):347-9. PubMed ID: 662531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial frequency filtering and target identification. Norman J; Ehrlich S Vision Res; 1987; 27(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 3617549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In search of paintings influence on time judgement. Stoyanova Y; Yakimoff N; Gourevich A; Mitrani L Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1987; 47(2-3):103-9. PubMed ID: 3673673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Redies C Spat Vis; 2007; 21(1-2):97-117. PubMed ID: 18073053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Some principles of spatial organization in art. Tyler CW Spat Vis; 2007; 20(6):509-30. PubMed ID: 18073044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. Polzella DJ Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 11011895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reappraising abstract paintings after exposure to background information. Park SA; Yun K; Jeong J PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0124159. PubMed ID: 25945789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]