These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534385)
1. Tibial post failures in a condylar posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. Bal BS; Greenberg D; Li S; R Mauerhan D; Schultz L; Cherry K J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):650-5. PubMed ID: 18534385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Hernigou P; Deschamps G J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 14996875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 4- to 10-year results with the anatomic modular total knee. Bugbee WD; Ammeen DJ; Parks NL; Engh GA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):158-65. PubMed ID: 9553548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty in the same patients. Kim YH; Park JW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Nov; 96(21):1807-13. PubMed ID: 25378508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. Dixon MC; Brown RR; Parsch D; Scott RD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 87(3):598-603. PubMed ID: 15741628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Sierra RJ; Berry DJ J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):20-3. PubMed ID: 18701240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interactive effect of femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial posterior slope on knee flexion in posterior cruciate ligament-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Han HS; Kang SB Knee; 2018 Mar; 25(2):335-340. PubMed ID: 29525547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medium-term results with the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma knee prosthesis the Wrightington experience. Zaki SH; Rafiq I; Kapoor A; Raut V; Gambhir AK; Porter ML Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Feb; 73(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 17441659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. Olgun ZD; Atilla B J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):499; author reply 499. PubMed ID: 20171046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of the tibial slope on tibial translation and mobility of non-constrained total knee prosthesis]. Migaud H; De Ladoucette A; Dohin B; Cloutier JM; Gougeon F; Duquennoy A Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8762983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can post-cam function be replaced by addition of a third condyle in PS TKA? Nakamura S; Sharma A; Nakamura K; Ikeda N; Zingde SM; Komistek RD J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1871-6. PubMed ID: 24890996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five cases of failure of the tibial polyethylene insert locking mechanism in one design of constrained knee arthroplasty. Rapuri VR; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Beauchamp CP J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):976.e21-4. PubMed ID: 20801615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert. Hofmann AA; Tkach TK; Evanich CJ; Camargo MP J Arthroplasty; 2000 Aug; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 10959995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post impingement in posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty. Verborgt O; Victor J Acta Orthop Belg; 2004 Feb; 70(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 15055317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up]. Gacon G; Coillard JY; Barba L; Travers V Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Condylar-stabilizing tibial inserts do not restore anteroposterior stability after total knee arthroplasty. Sur YJ; Koh IJ; Park SW; Kim HJ; In Y J Arthroplasty; 2015 Apr; 30(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 25492246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early failure of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-polyethylene tibial component. Saenz CL; McGrath MS; Marker DR; Seyler TM; Mont MA; Bonutti PM Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19553128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty implants combined with surface cementation produced satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes at the 5-year follow-up. Ishii Y; Noguchi H; Sato J; Ishii H; Ishii R; Toyabe SI Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jul; 27(7):2181-2188. PubMed ID: 31016360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]