BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534434)

  • 1. Removal of the well-fixed hip resurfacing acetabular component: a simple, bone preserving technique.
    Taylor PR; Stoffel KK; Dunlop DG; Yates PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):484-6. PubMed ID: 18534434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modification of the explant system for the removal of well fixed hip resurfacing sockets.
    Rawal JS; Soler JA; Rhee JS; Dobson MH; Konan S; Haddad FS
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1170.e7-9. PubMed ID: 20171047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed cementless, large-diameter metal-on-metal acetabular components.
    Olyslaegers C; Wainwright T; Middleton RG
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1071-3. PubMed ID: 18555640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of modular femoral head trials to centre the Explant blade facilitates retrieval of well-fixed acetabular components with minimal bone loss.
    Preiss RA; Patil S; Meek RM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):1003-6. PubMed ID: 21221612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of a well-fixed metal-metal hip resurfacing acetabular component.
    Lachiewicz PF
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 19327268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple technique to remove well-fixed, all-polyethylene cemented acetabular component in revision hip arthroplasty.
    de Thomasson E; Mazel C; Gagna G; Guingand O
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jun; 16(4):538-40. PubMed ID: 11402425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removing a well-fixed nonmodular large-bearing cementless acetabular component: a simple modification of an existing removal device.
    Blumenfeld TJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):498.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19442485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal of well-fixed femoral and acetabular components.
    Paprosky WG; Martin EL
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Aug; 31(8):476-8. PubMed ID: 12216971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A technique for removing a well-fixed cemented acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Sabboubeh A; Al Khatib M
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Sep; 20(6):800-1. PubMed ID: 16139720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Catastrophic fracture of a stable metal acetabular component.
    Papaliodis DN; Uhl RL; Fuchs MD
    Orthopedics; 2012 Aug; 35(8):e1260-3. PubMed ID: 22868616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation.
    Della Valle CJ; Stuchin SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):1081-3. PubMed ID: 11740769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for removing the polyethylene liner during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Bal BS; Aleto T
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 May; 35(5):242-3. PubMed ID: 16764186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A technique to remove a well-fixed titanium-coated RM acetabular cup in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Judas FM; Dias RF; Lucas FM
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jun; 6():31. PubMed ID: 21689456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision of the well fixed Birmingham Hip Resurfacing acetabular component--results using a novel device.
    Sandiford NA; Muirhead-Allwood S; Skinner J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Feb; 78(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 22523927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new technique for removing noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Markovich GD; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1999 Jan; 28(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 10048356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new technique for removal of the total hip arthroplasty acetabular component.
    Anspach WE; Lachiewicz PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jul; (268):152-6. PubMed ID: 2060203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.
    Porsch M; Schmidt J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of arthroscopy in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Khanduja V; Villar RN
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jan; 24(1):122.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18182213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midterm survivorship of a press-fit, plasma-sprayed, tri-spike acetabular component.
    Klaassen MA; Martínez-Villalobos M; Pietrzak WS; Mangino GP; Guzman DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 18534453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.