These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534472)

  • 1. The role of vibration and drainage in femoral impaction bone grafting.
    Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi G; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1157-64. PubMed ID: 18534472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur.
    Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi SP; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 17540758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of a model for in vitro testing of femoral stems in impaction bone grafting.
    Heal JS; Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Grimm B; Learmonth ID; Miles AW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 May; 221(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 17605395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Femoral stem impaction grafting: extending the role of cement.
    Gehrke T; Gebauer M; Kendoff D
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):92-4. PubMed ID: 24187362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of vibration on the shear strength of impacted bone graft in revision hip surgery.
    Brennan SA; Brabazon D; O'Byrne JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 21586773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the addition of hydroxyapatite graft substitutes upon the hoop strain and subsequent subsidence of a femoral model during impaction bone grafting.
    McNamara IR; Rayment A; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 22100099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
    Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results.
    Halliday BR; English HW; Timperley AJ; Gie GA; Ling RS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 Aug; 85(6):809-17. PubMed ID: 12931796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
    Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vivo experiment of porous bioactive bone cement modified by bioglass and chitosan].
    Li Y; Lei W; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Niu E; Yu L; Wu J; Zang Y; Liu Z; Wu Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23672134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A-mode ultrasound-based intra-femoral bone cement detection and 3D reconstruction in RTHR.
    Heger S; Mumme T; Sellei R; De La Fuente M; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 17538789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Finite element simulation of bone grafting process for avascular necrosis of femoral head].
    Lian Z; Zhao D; Zhang H; Wang W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 25(5):1063-7. PubMed ID: 19024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graft incorporation after acetabular and femoral impaction grafting with washed irradiated allograft and autologous marrow.
    Deakin DE; Bannister GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 17197314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with severe bone loss using impaction bone grafting technique.
    Lee GC; Nelson CL; Virmani S; Manikonda K; Israelite CL; Garino JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):405-9. PubMed ID: 19285380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
    Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological and biomechanical study of impacted cancellous allografts with cement in the femur: a canine model.
    Omoto O; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Deie M; Ochi M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1357-64. PubMed ID: 18758792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Particle size influence in an impaction bone grafting model. Comparison of fresh-frozen and freeze-dried allografts.
    Cornu O; Schubert T; Libouton X; Manil O; Godts B; Van Tomme J; Banse X; Delloye C
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2238-42. PubMed ID: 19656513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the cohesion of impaction bone graft.
    Oakley J; Kuiper JH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 16720782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.