125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534484)
1. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up.
Levine BR; Della Valle CJ; Deirmengian CA; Breien KM; Weeden SH; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 18534484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A constrained liner cemented into a secure cementless acetabular shell.
Callaghan JJ; Parvizi J; Novak CC; Bremner B; Shrader W; Lewallen DG; Johnston RC; Goetz DD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Oct; 86(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 15466729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of tripolar constrained total hip arthroplasty in revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
El-Husseiny M; Masri B; Duncan C; Garbuz DS
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):123-126. PubMed ID: 31146561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Tripolar arthroplasty for recurrent total hip prosthesis dislocation].
Beaulé PE; Roussignol X; Schmalzried TP; Udomkiat P; Amstutz HC; Dujardin FH
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 May; 89(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 12844048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision hip arthroplasty for late instability secondary to polyethylene wear.
Parvizi J; Wade FA; Rapuri V; Springer BD; Berry DJ; Hozack WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():66-9. PubMed ID: 16672896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Constrained liner in neurologic or cognitively impaired patients undergoing primary THA.
Hernigou P; Filippini P; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH; Batista SU; Poignard A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3255-62. PubMed ID: 20376709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a constrained tripolar acetabular liner to treat intraoperative instability and postoperative dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a review of our experience.
Callaghan JJ; O'Rourke MR; Goetz DD; Lewallen DG; Johnston RC; Capello WN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):117-23. PubMed ID: 15577475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: the United Kingdom experience.
Vasukutty NL; Middleton RG; Matthews EC; Young PS; Uzoigwe CE; Minhas TH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 22529077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adventure sports and sexual freedom hip replacement: the tripolar hip.
Pritchett JW
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28660436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermediate-term radiographic and patient outcomes in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular calcar design and porous plasma coating.
Amanatullah DF; Meehan JP; Cullen AB; Kim SH; Jamali AA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1451-4. PubMed ID: 21497483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bipolar hip arthroplasty as a salvage treatment for instability of the hip.
Parvizi J; Morrey BF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1132-9. PubMed ID: 10954103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure?
Carter AH; Sheehan EC; Mortazavi SM; Purtill JJ; Sharkey PF; Parvizi J
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):46-52. PubMed ID: 21550768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Della Valle CJ; Chang D; Sporer S; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Paprosky WG
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7. PubMed ID: 16214010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restoration of the center of rotation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kim DH; Cho SH; Jeong ST; Park HB; Hwang SC; Park JS
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1041-6. PubMed ID: 19775853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome after femoral revision using the restoration cone/conical femoral revision stem.
Holt G; McCaul J; Jones B; Ingram R; Stark A
Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):11. PubMed ID: 21210631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented primary stem in 79 patients.
Thorey F; Lerch M; Kiel H; von Lewinski G; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Windhagen H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jul; 128(7):673-8. PubMed ID: 17909823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter Evaluation of a Modular Dual Mobility Construct for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Huang RC; Malkani AL; Harwin SF; Hozack WJ; Mont MA; Higuera-Rueda CA; Westrich GH
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S287-S291. PubMed ID: 31005430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
