These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534499)

  • 1. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases.
    Lavigne M; Rama KR; Roy A; Vendittoli PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18534499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoroacetabular impingement: a resurfacing solution.
    Brooks P; Bershadsky B
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):32-5. PubMed ID: 23118377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Yoo MC; Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():99-106. PubMed ID: 21543698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Harvey N; Zaragoza E; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17259408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
    Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior femoroacetabular impingement (PFAI) - after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ball ST; Schmalzried TP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19583549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior femoral neck impingement secondary to excess acetabular anteversion in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Dala-Ali BM; Welck M; Osborne I; Muirhead-Allwood SK
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Sep; 27(8):1580.e9-1580.e11. PubMed ID: 22560654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Girard J; Roy AG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 16877595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.
    Patel AB; Wagle RR; Usrey MM; Thompson MT; Incavo SJ; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a vascular study.
    Beaulé PE; Campbell PA; Hoke R; Dorey F
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16365117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty.
    Mont MA; Seyler TM; Ragland PS; Starr R; Erhart J; Bhave A
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 17197316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view.
    Lachiewicz PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():86-91. PubMed ID: 17632416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Wirth CJ; Gossé F
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Sep; 18(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 16953347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.
    Kurtz WB; Ecker TM; Reichmann WM; Murphy SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19559561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.