These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534507)

  • 21. In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty: flat compared with concave tibial joint surface.
    Uvehammer J; Kärrholm J; Brandsson S; Herberts P; Carlsson L; Karlsson J; Regnér L
    J Orthop Res; 2000 Nov; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 11192244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement.
    Agarwal S; Azam A; Morgan-Jones R
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1640-4. PubMed ID: 24293593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation is highly beneficial: a case control study.
    Lakstein D; Zarrabian M; Kosashvili Y; Safir O; Gross AE; Backstein D
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1047-52. PubMed ID: 20089381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function.
    Longstaff LM; Sloan K; Stamp N; Scaddan M; Beaver R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):570-8. PubMed ID: 18534396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of knee alignment after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Rolston L; Siewert K
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1111-4. PubMed ID: 18849140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Component alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty using diaphyseal engaging modular offset press-fit stems.
    Nakasone CK; Abdeen A; Khachatourians AG; Sugimori T; Vince KG
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1178-81. PubMed ID: 18534382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Function and quality of life in patients with recurvatum deformity after primary total knee arthroplasty: a review of our joint registry.
    Siddiqui MM; Yeo SJ; Sivaiah P; Chia SL; Chin PL; Lo NN
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22153947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The position of the tibial component affecting the postoperative mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty.
    Bae DK; Song SJ; Yoon KH; Shin SM
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1131-6. PubMed ID: 20022455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
    You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
    Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contemporary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a pegged tibial baseplate. Results at a minimum of ten years.
    Barrington JW; Sah A; Malchau H; Burke DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):874-8. PubMed ID: 19339572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Total knee arthroplasty using cementless keels and cemented tibial trays: 10-year results.
    Kolisek FR; Mont MA; Seyler TM; Marker DR; Jessup NM; Siddiqui JA; Monesmith E; Ulrich SD
    Int Orthop; 2009 Feb; 33(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 18185931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment of the tibial component in the Triathlon knee.
    Cashman JP; Carty FL; Synnott K; Kenny PJ
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Aug; 6():44. PubMed ID: 21854636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gull-wing osteotomy for the treatment of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Klein GR; Levine HB; Ambrose JF; Lamothe HC; Hartzband MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 19195835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Margin of error in alignment: a study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
    Maniar RN; Johorey AC; Pujary CT; Yadava AN
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20171044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Midterm results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic results of 108 knees.
    Unger AS; Duggan JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):855-60. PubMed ID: 21036009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uncemented tibial fixation total knee arthroplasty.
    Cossetto DJ; Gouda AD
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 20334998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.
    Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tibial-stem dissociation in a modular revision total knee arthroplasty system: a comparative clinical outcome study.
    Hakkalamani S; Prasanna VK; Wood EV; Acharya A; Parkinson RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 18534470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.
    Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM
    Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
    Helm AT; Kerin C; Ghalayini SR; McLauchlan GJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):941-4. PubMed ID: 18672343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.