451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534533)
1. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion.
Amuwa C; Dorr LD
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
Yoshimine F
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of surgical experience on accuracy of acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Reize P; Geiger EV; Suckel A; Rudert M; Wülker N
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Jul; 37(7):360-3. PubMed ID: 18795183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Widmer KH; Majewski M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: a prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements.
Reikerås O; Gunderson RB
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Oct; 97(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 21889919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion.
Bargar WL; Jamali AA; Nejad AH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19714389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament for acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: an analysis of acetabular component position and range of movement using navigation software.
Kalteis T; Sendtner E; Beverland D; Archbold PA; Hube R; Schuster T; Renkawitz T; Grifka J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21768623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty.
Sotereanos NG; Miller MC; Smith B; Hube R; Sewecke JJ; Wohlrab D
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):832-40. PubMed ID: 16950035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
Miki H; Sugano N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular alignment and primary arc of motion for minus, skirtless, and skirted 28-, 32-, 36-, and 40-mm femoral heads.
Kosashvili Y; Omoto D; Backstein D; Safir O; Lakstein D; Gross AE
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):279-285.e2. PubMed ID: 22854347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion.
Haaker RG; Tiedjen K; Ottersbach A; Rubenthaler F; Stockheim M; Stiehl JB
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 17275626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
