These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534542)

  • 1. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Iorio R; Healy WL; Presutti AH
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 18534542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total hip arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in the treatment of Chinese patients with femoral head necrosis.
    Hui Z; Pei FX; Shen B; Yang J; Chen ZY; Huang Q
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1022-30. PubMed ID: 18534498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Hartofilakidis G; Georgiades G; Babis GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18534419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
    Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hot topics and controversies in arthroplasty: cementless femoral fixation in elderly patients.
    Dutton A; Rubash HE
    Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():255-9. PubMed ID: 18399588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: II. Clinical proof of concept--40 patients followed for 2 years.
    Carlsson LV; Albrektsson T; Albrektsson BE; Jacobsson CM; Macdonald W; Regnér L; Weidenhielm LR
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 16929431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty at Duke: 18- to 24-year follow-up.
    Ferrell MS; Browne JA; Attarian DE; Cook C; Bolognesi MP
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 19843441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cementless acetabular revision arthroplasty.
    Jain R; Schemitsch EH; Waddell JP
    Can J Surg; 2000 Aug; 43(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 10948687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50].
    Busch VJ; Gardeniers JW; Slooff TJ; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1935-40. PubMed ID: 17907545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid total hip replacement: outcome after a mean follow up of 10 years.
    Horne G; Culliford N; Adams K; Devane P
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Aug; 77(8):638-41. PubMed ID: 17635275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: I. Preliminary investigations--52 patients followed for 3 years.
    Carlsson LV; Albrektsson BE; Albrektsson BG; Albrektsson TO; Jacobsson CM; Macdonald W; Regnér L; Röstlund T; Weidenhielm LR
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 16929430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):e17-22. PubMed ID: 19070709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Salvage of failed dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.
    Said GZ; Farouk O; El-Sayed A; Said HG
    Injury; 2006 Feb; 37(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16378609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
    Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total hip arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures using a cementless tapered femoral stem.
    Klein GR; Parvizi J; Vegari DN; Rothman RH; Purtill JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17162172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open reduction internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty of selected acetabular fractures.
    Boraiah S; Ragsdale M; Achor T; Zelicof S; Asprinio DE
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Apr; 23(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19318866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach.
    Zimmerma S; Hawkes WG; Hudson JI; Magaziner J; Hebel JR; Towheed T; Gardner J; Provenzano G; Kenzora JE
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Mar; 20(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 11918295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.