These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534546)

  • 1. An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Tanino H; Ito H; Harman MK; Matsuno T; Hodge WA; Banks SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18534546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
    Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
    Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unconstrained tripolar hip implants: effect on hip stability.
    Guyen O; Chen QS; Bejui-Hugues J; Berry DJ; An KN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():202-8. PubMed ID: 17279045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.
    Glaser D; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Miner TM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18022739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.
    Patel AB; Wagle RR; Usrey MM; Thompson MT; Incavo SJ; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.
    Incavo SJ; Thompson MT; Gold JE; Patel RV; Icenogle KD; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20378308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.
    Kessler O; Patil S; Wirth S; Mayr E; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computer model of the position of the combined component in the prevention of impingement in total hip replacement.
    Barsoum WK; Patterson RW; Higuera C; Klika AK; Krebs VE; Molloy R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jun; 89(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 17613516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impact of joint capsule repair and external rotators suture on prognosis in primary total hip arthroplasty by posterolateral approach].
    Shen P; Xu N; Jiang F; Zhu L; Weng F; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1300-5. PubMed ID: 23230661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the unstable total hip arthroplasty.
    Hamilton WG; McAuley JP
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():87-92. PubMed ID: 15116602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements].
    Kliewe C; Souffrant R; Kluess D; Woernle C; Brökel K; Bader R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Feb; 55(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20128745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.