162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18534851)
1. Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: initial observations.
Liu H; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q
Breast; 2008 Oct; 17(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 18534851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Zhang B; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Yang M; Dai Q; Zhu QL; Gao P
Thyroid; 2010 Jan; 20(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20067379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.
Xiao XY; Chen X; Guan XF; Wu H; Qin W; Luo BM
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160546. PubMed ID: 27529640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound features of hepatocellular adenoma and the additional value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Dong Y; Zhu Z; Wang WP; Mao F; Ji ZB
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2016 Feb; 15(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26818543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination of the breast: a literature review.
Drudi FM; Cantisani V; Gnecchi M; Malpassini F; Di Leo N; de Felice C
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E1-E7. PubMed ID: 22623129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Tánczos E; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24445092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prospective analysis of quantification of contrast media enhanced power Doppler sonography of equivocal breast lesions].
Pudszuhn A; Marx Ch; Malich A; Fleck M; Schneider A; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 12677504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced low MI real time ultrasound and SonoVue].
Hohmann J; Skrok J; Puls R; Albrecht T
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12811698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging.
Ricci P; Cantisani V; Ballesio L; Pagliara E; Sallusti E; Drudi FM; Trippa F; Calascibetta F; Erturk SM; Modesti M; Passariello R
Ultraschall Med; 2007 Feb; 28(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17304413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Wan C; Du J; Fang H; Li F; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e444-50. PubMed ID: 21612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?
Sorelli PG; Cosgrove DO; Svensson WE; Zaman N; Satchithananda K; Barrett NK; Lim AK
J Clin Ultrasound; 2010 May; 38(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 20146214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasonography: imaging features with histopathologic correlation.
Liu H; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q; Chang XY
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Jul; 28(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 19546333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A contrast-enhanced ultrasound study of benign and malignant breast tissue.
Barnard S; Leen E; Cooke T; Angerson W
S Afr Med J; 2008 May; 98(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 18637311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Papillary breast lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: morphological enhancement patterns and diagnostic strategy.
Xia HS; Wang X; Ding H; Wen JX; Fan PL; Wang WP
Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3178-90. PubMed ID: 25149297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microvascular architecture of breast lesions: evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging.
Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Xia JG; Zhu CX
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jun; 27(6):833-42; quiz 844. PubMed ID: 18499843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. D-galactose-based signal-enhanced color Doppler sonography of breast tumors and tumorlike lesions.
Schroeder RJ; Maeurer J; Vogl TJ; Hidajat N; Hadijuana J; Venz S; Weber S; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 1999 Feb; 34(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9951790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing ultrasound-guided biopsy of musculoskeletal masses by application of an ultrasound contrast agent.
Loizides A; Widmann G; Freuis T; Peer S; Gruber H
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jun; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 20938892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
