165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18535029)
1. Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene?
Morris E; Quirke P; Thomas JD; Fairley L; Cottier B; Forman D
Gut; 2008 Dec; 57(12):1690-7. PubMed ID: 18535029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk adjusted benchmarking of abdominoperineal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma in the context of the Belgian PROCARE improvement project.
Penninckx F; Fieuws S; Beirens K; Demetter P; Ceelen W; Kartheuser A; Molle G; Van de Stadt J; Vindevoghel K; Van Eycken E;
Gut; 2013 Jul; 62(7):1005-11. PubMed ID: 22525885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low abdominoperineal excision rates are associated with high-workload surgeons and lower tumour height. Is further specialization needed?
Morris EJ; Birch R; West NP; Finan PJ; Forman D; Fairley L; Quirke P
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jul; 13(7):755-61. PubMed ID: 20236155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.
Porter GA; Soskolne CL; Yakimets WW; Newman SC
Ann Surg; 1998 Feb; 227(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 9488510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A population-based study on outcome in relation to the type of resection in low rectal cancer.
Anderin C; Martling A; Hellborg H; Holm T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 May; 53(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 20389209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local excision for early stage rectal cancer in patients over age 65 years: 2000-2009.
Gillern SM; Mahmoud NN; Paulson EC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Feb; 58(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 25585074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local recurrence following abdominoperineal excision and anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.
Amato A; Pescatori M; Butti A
Dis Colon Rectum; 1991 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 2007349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Ortiz H; Ciga MA; Armendariz P; Kreisler E; Codina-Cazador A; Gomez-Barbadillo J; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
Br J Surg; 2014 Jun; 101(7):874-82. PubMed ID: 24817654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
West NP; Anderin C; Smith KJ; Holm T; Quirke P;
Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):588-99. PubMed ID: 20186891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E
Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Permanent stoma rates: a misleading marker of quality in rectal cancer surgery.
Codd RJ; Evans MD; Davies M; Harris DA; Chandrasekaran TV; Khot UP; Morgan AR; Beynon J
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Apr; 16(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 24299162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intersphincteric Resection Has Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy: Results of Propensity Score Analyses.
Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Shida D; Ochiai H; Yamada K; Kanemitsu Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Sep; 61(9):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 30086052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Spincter preservation after selective chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim results of the OCUM study].
Baral J; Schön MR; Ruppert R; Ptok H; Strassburg J; Brosi P; Kreis ME; Lewin A; Sauer J; Sawicki S; Schiffmann L; Winde G; Junginger T; Merkel S; Hermanek P
Chirurg; 2015 Dec; 86(12):1138-44. PubMed ID: 26347011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision.
Jones H; Moran B; Crane S; Hompes R; Cunningham C;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 27321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.
Asplund D; Haglind E; Angenete E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 22221401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer.
Palmer G; Anderin C; Martling A; Holm T
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):527-32. PubMed ID: 24602235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in circumferential resection margin involvement after abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection no longer significant.
van Leersum N; Martijnse I; den Dulk M; Kolfschoten N; Le Cessie S; van de Velde C; Tollenaar R; Wouters M; Rutten HJ
Ann Surg; 2014 Jun; 259(6):1150-5. PubMed ID: 24096756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sphincter preservation rates after radical resection for rectal cancer in the United States veteran population: opportunity for improvement in early disease.
Mohammed S; Anaya DA; Awad SS; Albo D; Berger DH; Artinyan A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):216-23. PubMed ID: 25256129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.
Burns EM; Bottle A; Aylin P; Darzi A; Nicholls RJ; Faiz O
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4836. PubMed ID: 21846714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
