219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18535088)
21. Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion.
Jurek AM; Maldonado G; Greenland S; Church TR
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jul; 61(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 17568060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantifying errors without random sampling.
Phillips CV; LaPole LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jun; 3():9. PubMed ID: 12892568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Methodological uncertainties in multi-regression analyses of middle-atmospheric data series.
Kerzenmacher TE; Keckhut P; Hauchecorne A; Chanin ML
J Environ Monit; 2006 Jul; 8(7):682-90. PubMed ID: 16826281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determining the presence of bias error using statistical methods.
Kwartowitz DM; Galloway RL; Shiavi RG
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jan; 13(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19129017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reduction of noise due to systematic uncertainties in 113mIn SPECT imaging using information theory.
Krishna Kumar PT; Phoha VV; Iyengar SS; Iyengar P
Comput Biol Med; 2009 May; 39(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 19389664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Heuristic thinking and inference from observational epidemiology.
Lash TL
Epidemiology; 2007 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 17149141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Uncertainty of measurement for competitive and indirect ELISAs.
Toussaint JF; Assam P; Caij B; Dekeyser F; Knapen K; Imberechts H; Goris N; Molenberghs G; Mintiens K; De Clercq K
Rev Sci Tech; 2007 Dec; 26(3):649-56. PubMed ID: 18293613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Serum cholesterol during 27 years: assessment of systematic error and affecting factors and their role in interpreting population trends.
Sundvall J; Leiviskä J; Alfthan G; Vartiainen E
Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Mar; 378(1-2):93-8. PubMed ID: 17169352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Univariate calibration by reversed regression of heteroscedastic data: a case study.
Zeng QC; Zhang E; Tellinghuisen J
Analyst; 2008 Dec; 133(12):1649-55. PubMed ID: 19082066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 2. Evaluation for a found insignificant experimental bias.
Synek V
Talanta; 2007 Feb; 71(3):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19071450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Shared uncertainty in measurement error problems, with application to Nevada Test Site fallout data.
Li Y; Guolo A; Hoffman FO; Carroll RJ
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1226-36. PubMed ID: 18078484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On the concept of model structural error.
Beven K
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):167-75. PubMed ID: 16304949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bayesian modeling of measurement errors and pesticide concentration in dietary risk assessments.
Kennedy M; Hart A
Risk Anal; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19645757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Recommendations for expressing uncertainty of measurement of quantitative results in laboratory medicine].
Giroud C; Dumontet M; Vassault A; Braconnier F; Férard G;
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 17353174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bayesian decision threshold, detection limit and confidence limits in ionising-radiation measurement.
Weise K; Hübel K; Rose E; Schläger M; Schrammel D; Täschner M; Michel R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 16868015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. State estimation bias induced by optimization under uncertainty and error cost asymmetry is likely reflected in perception.
Shimansky YP
Biol Cybern; 2011 May; 104(4-5):225-33. PubMed ID: 21523488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 1. Evaluation for a given value of the true bias.
Synek V
Talanta; 2006 Dec; 70(5):1024-34. PubMed ID: 18970877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved evaluation of measurement uncertainty from sampling by inclusion of between-sampler bias using sampling proficiency testing.
Ramsey MH; Geelhoed B; Wood R; Damant AP
Analyst; 2011 Apr; 136(7):1313-21. PubMed ID: 21279235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of altering randomization intervals on precision of measurement and item exposure.
Muckle T; Bergstrom B; Becker K; Stahl J
J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18480512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Error analysis for NMR polymer microstructure measurement without calibration standards.
Qiu X; Zhou Z; Gobbi G; Redwine OD
Anal Chem; 2009 Oct; 81(20):8585-9. PubMed ID: 19764702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
