These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1853515)

  • 21. The migration of Proteus mirabilis and other urinary tract pathogens over Foley catheters.
    Sabbuba N; Hughes G; Stickler DJ
    BJU Int; 2002 Jan; 89(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 11849161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. First use of cultured human urothelial cells for biocompatibility assessment: application to urinary catheters.
    Pariente JL; Bordenave L; Bareille R; Rouais F; Courtes C; Daude G; le Guillou M; Baquey C
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Apr; 40(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 9511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Urease-induced precipitation of phosphate salts in vitro on indwelling catheters made of different materials.
    Hedelin H; Grenabo L; Pettersson S
    Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):297-300. PubMed ID: 1949429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in "blockers" and "nonblockers".
    Kunin CM; Chin QF; Chambers S
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):899-902. PubMed ID: 3656551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of double-J stents.
    Pariente JL; Bordenave L; Valli N; Bareille R; Baquey C; Le Guillou M
    Urology; 1998 Sep; 52(3):524-30. PubMed ID: 9730478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical performance of silicone and latex external condom catheters.
    Edlich RF; Bailey T; Pine SA; Williams R; Rodeheaver GT; Steers WD
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2000; 10(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11194612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of urethral reaction to full silicone, hydrogen-coated and siliconised latex catheters.
    Talja M; Korpela A; Järvi K
    Br J Urol; 1990 Dec; 66(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 2265339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Adhesion of Escherichia coli rods to urological catheters].
    Zalas-Wiecek P; Gospodarek E; Piecyk K
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2009; 61(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 20201323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Elutable factors from latex-containing materials activate complement and inhibit cell proliferation. An in vitro biocompatibility study of medical devices.
    Våge DI; Garred P; Lea T; Mollnes TE
    Complement Inflamm; 1990; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 2225794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of urinary catheters impregnated with antiseptics in an in vitro urinary tract model.
    Gaonkar TA; Sampath LA; Modak SM
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 24(7):506-13. PubMed ID: 12887239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.
    Lam TB; Omar MI; Fisher E; Gillies K; MacLennan S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; 2014(9):CD004013. PubMed ID: 25248140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of in vitro encrustation on silicone and hydrogel-coated latex catheters.
    Cox AJ; Hukins DW; Sutton TM
    Br J Urol; 1988 Feb; 61(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 3349281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: conventional foley catheters.
    Lawrence EL; Turner IG
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Feb; 17(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 16502247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The assessment of urinary catheter toxicity using cell cultures: validation by comparison with an animal model.
    Nacey JN; Horsfall DJ; Delahunt B; Marshall VR
    J Urol; 1986 Sep; 136(3):706-9. PubMed ID: 3735560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The cytotoxicity assessment of the novel latex urinary catheter with prolonged antimicrobial activity.
    Kowalczuk D; Ginalska G; Przekora A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2011 Aug; 98(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 21548073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of hydrophilic polymer-coated latex, uncoated latex and PVC indwelling balloon catheters in the prevention of urinary infection.
    Tidd MJ; Gow JG; Pennington JH; Shelton J; Scott MR
    Br J Urol; 1976 Aug; 48(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 963410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of hydron on latex urinary catheters.
    Miller JM
    J Urol; 1975 Apr; 113(4):530. PubMed ID: 1117528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term catheter management: minimizing the problem of premature replacement due to balloon deflation.
    Barnes KE; Malone-Lee J
    J Adv Nurs; 1986 May; 11(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 3088078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resistance of catheters coated with a modified hydrogel to encrustation during an in vitro test.
    Cox AJ; Millington RS; Hukins DW; Sutton TM
    Urol Res; 1989; 17(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 2623790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of urine bag-changing regimens in elderly catheterised patients.
    Reid RI; Webster O; Pead PJ; Maskell R
    Lancet; 1982 Oct; 2(8301):754-6. PubMed ID: 6125820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.