137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18535301)
1. The appropriateness of the NC state-mandated reading competency test for deaf students as a criterion for high school graduation.
Lollis J; LaSasso C
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(1):76-98. PubMed ID: 18535301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading comprehension strategies used by deaf middle-school students.
Leirer K; Dancer J
Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):874. PubMed ID: 9885051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contextual constraint and comprehension of written sentences by deaf college students.
Fischler I
Am Ann Deaf; 1983 Jun; 128(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 6881002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiling the deaf high school student who is a problem in the classroom.
Kluwin TN
Adolescence; 1985; 20(80):863-75. PubMed ID: 4083143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual matching test-taking strategies used by deaf readers.
LaSasso C
J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 3981994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-taking skills: a missing component of deaf students' curriculum.
LaSasso CJ
Am Ann Deaf; 1999 Mar; 144(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10230081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fostering reader response and developing comprehension strategies in deaf and hard of hearing children.
Cerra KK; Watts-Taffe S; Rose S
Am Ann Deaf; 1997 Dec; 142(5):379-86. PubMed ID: 9439034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reading comprehension of deaf readers. The impact of too many or too few questions.
LaSasso CJ
Am Ann Deaf; 1993 Dec; 138(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 8135162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of WH question format versus incomplete statement format on deaf students' demonstration of comprehension of text-explicit information.
LaSasso C
Am Ann Deaf; 1979 Dec; 124(7):833-7. PubMed ID: 517369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential effects of oral reading to improve comprehension with severe learning disabled and educable mentally handicapped students.
Chang SQ; Williams RL; McLaughlin TF
Adolescence; 1983; 18(71):619-26. PubMed ID: 6650272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deaf children's speaking, writing, and comprehension of sentences.
Arnold P; Crossley E; Exley S
J Aud Res; 1982 Oct; 22(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 7188203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Written narratives of deaf and hearing students: story recall and inference.
Sarachan-Deily AB
J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 2580122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of context on deaf students' comprehension of difficult sentences.
Nolen SB; Wilbur RB
Am Ann Deaf; 1985 Jul; 130(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 4025097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of signed English pictures to facilitate reading comprehension by deaf students.
Wilson T; Hyde M
Am Ann Deaf; 1997 Oct; 142(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 9351303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reading comprehension of deaf adolescent residential school students and its relationship to hearing mothers' communication strategies and skills.
Kampfe CM
Am Ann Deaf; 1989 Dec; 134(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 2618920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classroom attributes and achievement test scores for deaf and hard of hearing students.
Holt J
Am Ann Deaf; 1994 Oct; 139(4):430-7. PubMed ID: 7810461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of screening procedures for assigning levels of the Stanford Achievement Test (eighth edition) to students who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Holt JA
Am Ann Deaf; 1995 Mar; 140(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 7778513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EPIC Experimental project in instructional concentration. Report of a study of the influence of intensifying instruction for elementary-school age deaf children. Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, Missouri.
Am Ann Deaf; 1981 Nov; 126(8):867-974. PubMed ID: 7340480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Criterion-related validity of Raven's Progressive Matrices with deaf residential school students.
Blennerhassett L; Strohmeier SJ; Hibbett C
Am Ann Deaf; 1994 Mar; 139(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 8037075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability of deaf students to understand text. A comparison of the perceptions of teachers and students.
Ewoldt C; Israelite N; Dodds R
Am Ann Deaf; 1992 Oct; 137(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1471593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
