These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18535301)

  • 21. Incremental and predictive utility of formative assessment methods of reading comprehension.
    Marcotte AM; Hintze JM
    J Sch Psychol; 2009 Oct; 47(5):315-35. PubMed ID: 19712779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survey of residential and day schools for deaf students in the United States that identify themselves as bilingual-bicultural programs.
    LaSasso C; Lollis J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2003; 8(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 15448048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Language approaches used with deaf pupils in Scottish schools: 2001-2004.
    Grimes M; Thoutenhoofd ED; Byrne D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(4):530-51. PubMed ID: 17639018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The signed reading fluency of students who are deaf/hard of hearing.
    Easterbrooks SR; Huston SG
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(1):37-54. PubMed ID: 17607020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implications of utilizing a phonics-based reading curriculum with children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Trezek BJ; Wang Y
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 16452609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reading levels of Spanish deaf students.
    Torres Monreal S; Santana Hernández R
    Am Ann Deaf; 2005; 150(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 16466193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students.
    Blatto-Vallee G; Kelly RR; Gaustad MG; Porter J; Fonzi J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(4):432-48. PubMed ID: 17548803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reading comprehension strategies used by deaf middle-school students.
    Leirer K; Dancer J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):874. PubMed ID: 9885051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Teaching students with reading difficulties to be close readers: a feasibility study.
    Katz LA; Carlisle JF
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Jul; 40(3):325-40. PubMed ID: 19564445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating deaf students' readiness to meet the English language and literacy demands of postsecondary educational programs.
    Bochner JH; Walter GG
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 15843509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students.
    Coleman C; Lindstrom J; Nelson J; Lindstrom W; Gregg KN
    J Learn Disabil; 2010; 43(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 19933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are deaf students' reading challenges really about reading?
    Marschark M; Sapere P; Convertino CM; Mayer C; Wauters L; Sarchet T
    Am Ann Deaf; 2009; 154(4):357-70. PubMed ID: 20066918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers.
    Kelly LP
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2003; 8(3):230-49. PubMed ID: 15448051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Academic and Social Benefits of a Co-enrollment Model of Inclusive Education for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.
    Kreimeyer KH; Crooke P; Drye C; Egbert V; Klein B
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2000; 5(2):174-85. PubMed ID: 15454511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Focus-on-form instructional methods promote deaf college students' improvement in English grammar.
    Berent GP; Kelly RR; Aldersley S; Schmitz KL; Khalsa BK; Panara J; Keenan S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 16887881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Cheng SF; Rose S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(4):503-15. PubMed ID: 19564174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonological awareness and short-term memory in hearing and deaf individuals of different communication backgrounds.
    Koo D; Crain K; LaSasso C; Eden GF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Dec; 1145():83-99. PubMed ID: 19076391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical Examination of Three Methods of Teaching Reading Comprehension to Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: From Research to Classroom Applications.
    Al-Hilawani YA
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2003; 8(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 15448064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using Noldus Observer XT for research on deaf signers learning to read: an innovative methodology.
    Ducharme DA; Arcand I
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Aug; 41(3):833-40. PubMed ID: 19587199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decreased scholastic achievement in overweight middle school students.
    Shore SM; Sachs ML; Lidicker JR; Brett SN; Wright AR; Libonati JR
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2008 Jul; 16(7):1535-8. PubMed ID: 18451772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.