These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18535683)

  • 1. Evaluation of total disc arthroplasty: a canine model.
    Taylor BA; Okubadejo GO; Patel AA; Talcott MR; Imamura T; Hu N; Cunningham BW
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Apr; 37(4):E64-70. PubMed ID: 18535683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
    Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis.
    Wong DA; Annesser B; Birney T; Lamond R; Kumar A; Johnson S; Jatana S; Ghiselli G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 17197326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.
    Puttlitz CM; DiAngelo DJ
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):589-94, v. PubMed ID: 16326281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion preservation technologies: alternatives to spinal fusion.
    Singh K; An HS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Sep; 35(9):411-6. PubMed ID: 17036776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and evaluation of the FlexiCore metal-on-metal intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Valdevit A; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):276S-288S. PubMed ID: 15541677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goals of cervical disc replacement.
    Albert TJ; Eichenbaum MD
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):292S-293S. PubMed ID: 15541679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review.
    Resnick DK; Watters WC
    Clin Neurosurg; 2007; 54():83-7. PubMed ID: 18504901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
    Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.