These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18536027)
21. The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range? Anderson R; Haas M; Shanahan M Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18290913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district]. Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A workplace breast cancer screening program. Costs and components. Schrammel P; Griffiths RI; Griffiths CB AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):523-9. PubMed ID: 9934000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study. Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening. Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of mammography in different ethnic groups in Israel--analysis of mortality reduction and costs using CAN*TROL. Rennert G Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 1723656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing. Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Recruiting older women for screening mammography. Halabi S; Vogel VG; Bondy ML; Vernon SW Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 8402722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on cervical cancer mortality among uninsured low-income women in the U.S., 1991-2007. Ekwueme DU; Uzunangelov VJ; Hoerger TJ; Miller JW; Saraiya M; Benard VB; Hall IJ; Royalty J; Li C; Myers ER Am J Prev Med; 2014 Sep; 47(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 25015564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography: creating a financially viable service. Chen SL; Clark S; Pierce LJ; Hayes DF; Helvie MA; Greeno PL; Newman LA; Chang AE Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 15329914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in a low socioeconomic group of Iranian women. Barfar E; Rashidian A; Hosseini H; Nosratnejad S; Barooti E; Zendehdel K Arch Iran Med; 2014 Apr; 17(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 24724599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk- and cost-benefit analyses of breast screening programs derived from absorbed dose measurements in The Netherlands. Zuur C; Broerse JJ Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 3928229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs. Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preventing cervical cancer : overviews of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and 2 US immunization programs. Khan K; Curtis CR; Ekwueme DU; Stokley S; Walker C; Roland K; Benard V; Saraiya M Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(10 Suppl):3004-12. PubMed ID: 18980296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identifying and controlling for program-level differences in comparative cost analysis: lessons from the economic evaluation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Subramanian S; Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Bapat B; Kramer C Eval Program Plann; 2008 May; 31(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 18359084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States. Lairson DR; Chan W; Newmark GR Soc Sci Med; 2005 Oct; 61(7):1608-17. PubMed ID: 16005790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997-2012. Tangka FK; Howard DH; Royalty J; Dalzell LP; Miller J; O'Hara BJ; Sabatino SA; Joseph K; Kenney K; Guy GP; Hall IJ Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):671-86. PubMed ID: 25783455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Sabatino SA; Coates RJ; Uhler RJ; Breen N; Tangka F; Shaw KM Med Care; 2008 Jul; 46(7):692-700. PubMed ID: 18580388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation of the costs of mammographic screening program in the city of Florence]. Spagnolo G; Zappa M; Paci E; Giorgi D; Rosselli del Turco M Epidemiol Prev; 1995 Dec; 19(65):330-7. PubMed ID: 8852082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening. Feig S Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]