424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18536845)
1. Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier?
Langhoff JD; Mayer J; Faber L; Kaestner SB; Guibert G; Zlinszky K; Auer JA; von Rechenberg B
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 18536845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants.
Lee JE; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Lee SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 19885405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study.
Park KH; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee JB; Kim SH; Lim YJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):517-27. PubMed ID: 17559620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model.
Pearce AI; Pearce SG; Schwieger K; Milz S; Schneider E; Archer CW; Richards RG
J Orthop Res; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1377-83. PubMed ID: 18464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.
Ferguson SJ; Broggini N; Wieland M; de Wild M; Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Cochran DL; Buser D
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of Osseotite and machined-surfaced titanium implants in membrane-covered critical-sized defects: a histologic and histometric study in dogs.
Veis AA; Papadimitriou S; Trisi P; Tsirlis AT; Parissis NA; Kenealy JN
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 17348879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone.
Johansson CB; Han CH; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9638001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
