BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537116)

  • 1. Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data.
    Deshpande G; LaConte S; James GA; Peltier S; Hu X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1361-73. PubMed ID: 18537116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint EEG/fMRI state space model for the detection of directed interactions in human brains--a simulation study.
    Lenz M; Musso M; Linke Y; Tüscher O; Timmer J; Weiller C; Schelter B
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Nov; 32(11):1725-36. PubMed ID: 22027197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GMAC: a Matlab toolbox for spectral Granger causality analysis of fMRI data.
    Tana MG; Sclocco R; Bianchi AM
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Oct; 42(10):943-56. PubMed ID: 22925560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis.
    Deshpande G; Hu X
    Brain Connect; 2012; 2(5):235-45. PubMed ID: 23016794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality.
    Sato JR; Junior EA; Takahashi DY; de Maria Felix M; Brammer MJ; Morettin PA
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 16434214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring Granger causality between cortical regions from voxelwise fMRI BOLD signals with LASSO.
    Tang W; Bressler SL; Sylvester CM; Shulman GL; Corbetta M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(5):e1002513. PubMed ID: 22654651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain network for passive word listening as evaluated with ICA and Granger causality.
    Londei A; D'Ausilio A; Basso D; Sestieri C; Del Gratta C; Romani GL; Olivetti Belardinelli M
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 May; 72(4-6):284-92. PubMed ID: 17452288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern-based Granger causality mapping in FMRI.
    Kim E; Kim DS; Ahmad F; Park H
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 24059863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of Granger causality and coherency in fMRI-based analysis of the motor system.
    Kayser AS; Sun FT; D'Esposito M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Nov; 30(11):3475-94. PubMed ID: 19387980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of multivariate Granger causality analyses with embedded dimension reduction on network modules.
    Schmidt C; Pester B; Nagarajan M; Witte H; Leistritz L; Wismueller A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2797-800. PubMed ID: 25570572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multivariate information-theoretic measures reveal directed information structure and task relevant changes in fMRI connectivity.
    Lizier JT; Heinzle J; Horstmann A; Haynes JD; Prokopenko M
    J Comput Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 30(1):85-107. PubMed ID: 20799057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constructing fMRI connectivity networks: a whole brain functional parcellation method for node definition.
    Maggioni E; Tana MG; Arrigoni F; Zucca C; Bianchi AM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 228():86-99. PubMed ID: 24675050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovering directed networks in neuroimaging datasets using partially conditioned Granger causality.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 23530810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Granger causality a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data?
    Wen X; Rangarajan G; Ding M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67428. PubMed ID: 23861763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of intra- and inter-subject variability of hemodynamic responses on group level Granger causality analyses.
    Schippers MB; Renken R; Keysers C
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jul; 57(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 21316469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kernel Granger causality mapping effective connectivity on FMRI data.
    Liao W; Marinazzo D; Pan Z; Gong Q; Chen H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1825-35. PubMed ID: 19709972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directed transfer function analysis of fMRI data to investigate network dynamics.
    Deshpande G; LaConte S; Peltier S; Hu X
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():671-4. PubMed ID: 17946850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Multivariate Granger Causality Concept towards Full Brain Functional Connectivity.
    Schmidt C; Pester B; Schmid-Hertel N; Witte H; Wismüller A; Leistritz L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153105. PubMed ID: 27064897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic causal modeling and Granger causality Comments on: the identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution.
    Friston K
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):303-5; author reply 310-1. PubMed ID: 19770049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.