These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537392)

  • 21. Comparative study of fixed time versus intensity trade and fixed intensity versus time trade tests in sound lateralization.
    Dekio-Hotta S; Kaga K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 16431062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Seeber BU; Fastl H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1030-42. PubMed ID: 18247905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interactions between auditory 'what' and 'where' pathways revealed by enhanced near-threshold discrimination of frequency and position.
    Tardif E; Spierer L; Clarke S; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 18191423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial discrimination of sound sources in the horizontal plane following an adapter sound.
    Getzmann S
    Hear Res; 2004 May; 191(1-2):14-20. PubMed ID: 15109700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The three-channel model of sound localization mechanisms: interaural level differences.
    Dingle RN; Hall SE; Phillips DP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4023-9. PubMed ID: 22559375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interaction in the perceptual processing of interaural time and level differences.
    Phillips DP; Carmichael ME; Hall SE
    Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 16309863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models.
    Goupell MJ; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1029-45. PubMed ID: 17672651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
    McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Primate hearing from a mammalian perspective.
    Heffner RS
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 281(1):1111-22. PubMed ID: 15472899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of ability to discriminate frequency of bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields.
    Yamashita A; Nishimura T; Nakagawa S; Sakaguchi T; Hosoi H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 18455304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic cues underlying auditory distance in barn owls.
    Kim DO; Moiseff A; Turner JB; Gull J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 18368570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual Weighting of Binaural Lateralization Cues across Frequency Bands.
    Ahrens A; Joshi SN; Epp B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 21(6):485-496. PubMed ID: 32915339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Särkkä AK; Salmi J; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(12):3329-41. PubMed ID: 18598270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of an imputed pitch velocity model of the auditory kappa effect.
    Henry MJ; McAuley JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):551-64. PubMed ID: 19331507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binaural model for artificial spatial sound localization based on interaural time delays and movements of the interaural axis.
    Kneip L; Baumann C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3108-19. PubMed ID: 19045796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Listeners' identification and discrimination of digitally manipulated sounds as prolongations.
    Kawai N; Healey EC; Carrell TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1102-10. PubMed ID: 17672657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The glissando illusion and handedness.
    Deutsch D; Hamaoui K; Henthorn T
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2981-8. PubMed ID: 17624379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue.
    Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3120-31. PubMed ID: 19045797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.