144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537407)
1. Improved scatterer size estimation using backscatter coefficient measurements with coded excitation and pulse compression.
Kanzler SG; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4599-607. PubMed ID: 18537407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel coded excitation scheme to improve spatial and contrast resolution of quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Sanchez JR; Pocci D; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2111-23. PubMed ID: 19942499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling and phantom studies of ultrasonic wall shear rate measurements using coded pulse excitation.
Tsou JK; Liu J; Insana MF
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Apr; 53(4):724-34. PubMed ID: 16615576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bandwidth and resolution enhancement through pulse compression.
Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Apr; 54(4):768-81. PubMed ID: 17441586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small lesion detection with resolution enhancement compression.
Linden P; Sanchez JR; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 20690429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chirp-coded excitation imaging with a high-frequency ultrasound annular array.
Mamou J; Ketterling JA; Silverman RH
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Feb; 55(2):508-13. PubMed ID: 18334358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of the spatial resolution of different high-frequency imaging systems using a novel anechoic-sphere phantom.
Filoux E; Mamou J; Aristizábal O; Ketterling JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 May; 58(5):994-1005. PubMed ID: 21622055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coded pulse excitation for ultrasonic strain imaging.
Liu J; Insana MF
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Feb; 52(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 15801311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved parametric imaging of scatterer size estimates using angular compounding.
Gerig AL; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jun; 51(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 15244284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
Rubert N; Varghese T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental assessment of four ultrasound scattering models for characterizing concentrated tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Franceschini E; Guillermin R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3735-47. PubMed ID: 23231104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging System with Chirp-Coded Excitation for Assessing Biomechanical Properties of Elasticity Phantom.
Chun GC; Chiang HJ; Lin KH; Li CM; Chen PJ; Chen T
Materials (Basel); 2015 Dec; 8(12):8392-8413. PubMed ID: 28793718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
