These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537784)

  • 1. Some main problems eroding the credibility and relevance of randomized trials.
    Ioannidis JP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 18537784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical issues in longitudinal and observational studies: purpose, short versus long term, selection of study instruments, methods, outcomes, and biases.
    Wolfe F
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):469-72. PubMed ID: 9972989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primer: the fallacy of subgroup analysis.
    Guillemin F
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2007 Jul; 3(7):407-13. PubMed ID: 17599075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite outcomes in randomized clinical trials: arguments for and against.
    Ross S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):119.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17306647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in clinical intervention research.
    Gluud LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 16443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perfect study, poor evidence: interpretation of biases preceding study design.
    Ioannidis JP
    Semin Hematol; 2008 Jul; 45(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 18582622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals.
    Yao F; Singer M; Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 17903567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculations in randomized trials: common pitfalls.
    Brasher PM; Brant RF
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 54(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 17272248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of study design in clinical trials for bladder cancer.
    Tannock IF
    Urol Clin North Am; 1992 Nov; 19(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 1441023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trials: are these your patients?
    Storms W
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2003 Nov; 112(5 Suppl):S107-11. PubMed ID: 14586395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in the planning and conduct of randomised trials.
    Bhandari M; Pape HC; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16487524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using evidence from randomized trials in fertility practice.
    Hughes EG
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2007 Mar; 10(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17454203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials.
    Appel LJ
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 1(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 17699370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tutorials in clinical research: part IV: recognizing and controlling bias.
    Hartman JM; Forsen JW; Wallace MS; Neely JG
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11802034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
    Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.