1352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537951)
21. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Metcalfe C; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22257140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Miller DP; Yu J; Flanders SC; Henning JM; Stier DM; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1171-7; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive significance of surgical margin status after prostatectomy for prostate cancer during PSA era.
Mann MJ; DeCastro GJ; Desai M; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1203-7. PubMed ID: 18674807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.
Orvieto MA; Alsikafi NF; Shalhav AL; Laven BA; Steinberg GD; Zagaja GP; Brendler CB
BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 17125478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of prostate-specific antigen testing on the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 cancers.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Blute ML
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 17922854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Recurrence following radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Analysis of clinical, biological and anatomo-pathological prognostic factors].
Feyaerts A; Delrée A; Lorge F; Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; Van Cangh PJ; Draguet AP; Cosyns JP
Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Mar; 65(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9245198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy.
Ward JF; Blute ML; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1872-6. PubMed ID: 14532796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence.
Bong GW; Ritenour CW; Osunkoya AO; Smith MT; Keane TE
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 19007381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S47-51. PubMed ID: 18405751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term oncologic results of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy.
Bianco FJ; Scardino PT; Stephenson AJ; Diblasio CJ; Fearn PA; Eastham JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 15890586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathological findings and prostate-specific antigen outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Ploussard G; Salomon L; Allory Y; Terry S; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Vacherot F; de la Taille A
BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19930177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
