These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537989)

  • 1. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images.
    Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?
    Doughty MJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Cheung SW; Cho P
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy.
    van Schaick W; van Dooren BT; Mulder PG; Völker-Dieben HJ
    Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium.
    Doughty MJ; Oblak E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 18201335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy.
    Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L
    Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
    Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the regional variability of averaged cell area estimates for the human corneal endothelium in relation to the extent of polymegethism.
    Doughty MJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2537-2546. PubMed ID: 29119310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semiautomated noncontact specular microscope.
    Doughty MJ
    Cornea; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1196-203. PubMed ID: 23792438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of standardizing the number of cells measured for coefficient of variation (COV) estimates of corneal endothelial cell area values as relevant to contact lens wear.
    Doughty MJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Jun; 44(3):101336. PubMed ID: 32513521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P
    Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
    Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central and Peripheral Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis With Slit-Scanning Wide-Field Contact Specular Microscopy: Agreement With Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
    Lee J; Mori Y; Ogata M; Minami K; Miyata K
    Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1137-1141. PubMed ID: 31394553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessments of corneal endothelial cell density in growing children and its relationship to horizontal corneal diameter.
    Müller A; Doughty MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):762-70. PubMed ID: 12512684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the reliability (repeatability) of single pachymetry measures taken with specular microscope-based assessments of the human corneal endothelium.
    Doughty MJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Apr; 42(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 30352742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Data quality of unsupervised endothelial cell counting vs. reading centre analysis in multicentric clinical trials].
    Böhringer D; Hettich L; Maier PC; Reinhard T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Jun; 229(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 22669738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The methods of analysis of the endothelial microscopy].
    Loukotová V; Hlinomazová Z; Horácková M; Vlková E
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2007 May; 63(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 17621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.