These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18537989)

  • 21. Morphometry of corneal endothelium in patients with corneal guttata.
    Giasson CJ; Solomon LD; Polse KA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1469-75. PubMed ID: 17507098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of the reliability of human corneal endothelial cell-density estimates using a noncontact specular microscope.
    Doughty MJ; Müller A; Zaman ML
    Cornea; 2000 Mar; 19(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 10746445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the Center and Flex-Center Methods of Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis in the Presence of Guttae.
    Huang J; Liu X; Tepelus TC; Nazikyan T; Chopra V; Sadda SR; Lee OL
    Cornea; 2017 Dec; 36(12):1514-1520. PubMed ID: 28834820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes.
    Price MO; Fairchild KM; Price FW
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 22893099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of applied corneal endothelium image segmentation techniques on the clinical parameters.
    Piorkowski A; Nurzynska K; Gronkowska-Serafin J; Selig B; Boldak C; Reska D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Jan; 55():13-27. PubMed ID: 27553657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices.
    Cakici O; Karadag R; Bayramlar H; Koyun E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):229-233. PubMed ID: 27221264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.
    Karaca I; Yilmaz SG; Palamar M; Ates H
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 28674859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A semi-automated assessment of cell size and shape in monolayers, with optional adjustment for the cell-cell border width-application to human corneal endothelium.
    Oblak E; Doughty MJ; Oblak L
    Tissue Cell; 2002 Aug; 34(4):283-95. PubMed ID: 12176311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of flex-center, center, and corner methods of corneal endothelial cell analysis.
    Patel SV; McLaren JW; Bachman LA; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1042-7. PubMed ID: 20520534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specular microscopes.
    Goldich Y; Marcovich AL; Barkana Y; Hartstein M; Morad Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 20175056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems.
    Benetz BA; Diaconu E; Bowlin SJ; Oak SS; Laing RA; Lass JH
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9894940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy.
    Klais CM; Bühren J; Kohnen T
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12592045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the ConfoScan3 for corneal endothelial morphology analysis.
    Sheng H; Parker EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 17873775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Panoramic view of human corneal endothelial cell layer observed by a prototype slit-scanning wide-field contact specular microscope.
    Tanaka H; Okumura N; Koizumi N; Sotozono C; Sumii Y; Kinoshita S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 101(5):655-659. PubMed ID: 27574178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a Reliable Automated Algorithm for the Morphometric Analysis of Human Corneal Endothelium.
    Scarpa F; Ruggeri A
    Cornea; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1222-8. PubMed ID: 27310881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of recording systems and analysis methods in specular microscopy.
    Ohno K; Nelson LR; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 1999 Jul; 18(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 10422853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor cornea endothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.
    Lass JH; Gal RL; Ruedy KJ; Benetz BA; Beck RW; Baratz KH; Holland EJ; Kalajian A; Kollman C; Manning FJ; Mannis MJ; McCoy K; Montoya M; Stulting D; Xing D;
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 15745770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability of a video-based noncontact specular microscope for assessing the corneal endothelium.
    Prinz A; Varga J; Findl O
    Cornea; 2007 Sep; 26(8):924-9. PubMed ID: 17721289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Gavet Y; Acquart S; Garraud O; Egelhoffer H; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2062-7. PubMed ID: 17460261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The endothelial sample size analysis in corneal specular microscopy clinical examinations.
    Abib FC; Holzchuh R; Schaefer A; Schaefer T; Godois R
    Cornea; 2012 May; 31(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 22333658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.