342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18538146)
1. Robotic radical hysterectomy.
Fanning J; Fenton B; Purohit M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):649.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18538146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.
Puntambekar SP; Palep RJ; Puntambekar SS; Wagh GN; Patil AM; Rayate NV; Agarwal GA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 17980327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):357.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience.
Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
Shafer A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S18-23. PubMed ID: 18771796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Vicario V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17848319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report.
Kaouk JH; Goel RK; Haber GP; Crouzet S; Stein RJ
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 18778353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Bandera CA; Magrina JF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
