These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida. Obure R; Reid CN; Salemi JL; Rubio E; Louis J; Sappenfield WM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):684.e1-684.e9. PubMed ID: 37321284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction. Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital-level variation in racial disparities in low-risk nulliparous cesarean delivery rates. Main EK; Chang SC; Tucker CM; Sakowski C; Leonard SA; Rosenstein MG Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Dec; 5(12):101145. PubMed ID: 37648109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety Assessment of a Large-Scale Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Nulliparous Cesarean Delivery Rates. Main EK; Chang SC; Cape V; Sakowski C; Smith H; Vasher J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):613-623. PubMed ID: 30870288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California. Rosenstein MG; Chang SC; Sakowski C; Markow C; Teleki S; Lang L; Logan J; Cape V; Main EK JAMA; 2021 Apr; 325(16):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 33904868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States. Little SE; Orav EJ; Robinson JN; Caughey AB; Jha AK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26721777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997. Coonrod DV; Bay RC; Kishi GY Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1355-62. PubMed ID: 10871449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Ehrenthal DB; Jiang X; Strobino DM Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 116(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 20567165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction in Cesarean Delivery Rates Associated With a State Quality Collaborative in Maryland. Callaghan-Koru JA; DiPietro B; Wahid I; Mark K; Burke AB; Curran G; Creanga AA Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 138(4):583-592. PubMed ID: 34623072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State. Hitti J; Walker S; Benedetti TJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):474.e1-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28666693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term. Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Racial Disparities in Cesarean Delivery Rates: Do Hospital-Level Factors Matter? Nicole Teal E; Baer RJ; Jelliffe-Pawlowski L; Mengesha B Am J Perinatol; 2024 Mar; 41(4):375-382. PubMed ID: 37913783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida. Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study. Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. Main EK; Moore D; Farrell B; Schimmel LD; Altman RJ; Abrahams C; Bliss MC; Polivy L; Sterling J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1644-51; discussion 1651-2. PubMed ID: 16643812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36 weeks of gestation: contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates. Brennan DJ; Murphy M; Robson MS; O'Herlihy C Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 117(2 Pt 1):273-279. PubMed ID: 21252739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]