These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18538228)

  • 21. Not all Class II patients alike.
    Standerwick RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):143; author reply 144-5. PubMed ID: 19651328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New horizons in orthodontics & dentofacial orthopedics: fixed Twin Blocks & TransForce lingual appliances.
    Clark WJ
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21561020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Problems with RCT design.
    Hayes JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):143-4; author reply 144-5. PubMed ID: 19651327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stability of interceptive/corrective orthodontic treatment for tooth ankylosis and Class II mandibular deficiency: A case report with 10 years follow-up.
    Guimarães CH; Henriques J; Janson G; Moura WS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 26275202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Importance of diagnosing and treating orthodontic and orthopedic problems in children.
    Rondeau BH
    Funct Orthod; 2004; 21(3):4, 6, 8 passim. PubMed ID: 15641448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Improving the effectiveness of functional jaw orthopedics in Class II malocclusion by appropriate treatment timing].
    Baccetti T
    Orthod Fr; 2010 Dec; 81(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 21144469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Early edgewise and interceptive treatment in Angle Class II division 1 in the mixed dentition].
    Aknin JJ
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Oct; 19(4):479-504. PubMed ID: 3869860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Past, present and future of functional orthodontics.
    Bowbeer GR
    Funct Orthod; 1995; 12(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 8613108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Early orthodontic treatment for growth modification by functional appliances--pros and cons].
    Tzemach M; Aizenbud D; Einy S
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Jan; 31(1):25-31, 61. PubMed ID: 24654498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The plastic fantastic vs. the metal merry-go-round.
    Spahl TJ
    Funct Orthod; 2004; 21(3):1. PubMed ID: 15641447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion.
    Rapaport M
    Aust Orthod J; 1998 Mar; 15(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 9590927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):234-43; quiz 339. PubMed ID: 12970656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block.
    Hammad SM; Bashir ES; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of a modified anterior inclined plane in the treatment on the dentoskeletal Class II division 2 patient.
    Rao SA; Thomas AM; Chopra S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 21157062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The mechanical "action maker" (Activator) and its use in interceptive orthodontic therapy].
    Spyropoulos MN; Bitsanis EX
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1982; 36(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 6819500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Interception of a Class 2 division 1 malocclusion using mandibular hyperpropulsion. Cephalometric results].
    Rochon G
    Inf Dent; 1986 Dec; 68(43):4397-401. PubMed ID: 3470257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outcomes of different Class II treatments : Comparisons using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System.
    Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 27098642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Interceptive treatment of a severe Class II, division I malocclusion].
    Ferro A; Cefariello S
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1980; 21(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 6960818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 2013 survey of Australian orthodontists' procedures.
    Miles P
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 24380137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Treatment criteria reviewed.
    Moskowitz EM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):18A. PubMed ID: 9484201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.