251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18538249)
1. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.
Zablocki HL; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):852-60. PubMed ID: 18538249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
Waters D; Harris EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Titanium miniplate as anchorage to close a premolar space by means of mesial movement of the maxillary molars.
Faber J; Velasque F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 19815163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial.
Feldmann I; Bondemark L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e19-28. PubMed ID: 18331927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.
Lee SJ; Kim TW; Nahm DS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 16769492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction of a Class III malocclusion with over 20 mm of space to close in the maxilla by using miniscrews for extra anchorage.
Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):459-69. PubMed ID: 18331948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distalization of the entire maxillary arch in an adult.
Kyung SH; Lee JY; Shin JW; Hong C; Dietz V; Gianelly AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S123-32. PubMed ID: 19362263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of first premolars extraction on vertical dimension in Italian patients with a Class I normo-divergent malocclusion. A retrospective study.
Greco M; Fichera G; Barbato E; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 20545094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
