BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18538361)

  • 1. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.
    Hayes JE; Duffy VB
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):77-87. PubMed ID: 18538361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation.
    Hayes JE; Duffy VB
    Chem Senses; 2007 Mar; 32(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 17204520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.
    Duffy VB; Bartoshuk LM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jun; 100(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 10863567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.
    Hayes JE; Sullivan BS; Duffy VB
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Jun; 100(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 20380843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of individual variations in taste sensitivity on coffee perceptions and preferences.
    Masi C; Dinnella C; Monteleone E; Prescott J
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Jan; 138():219-26. PubMed ID: 25446205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.
    Mennella JA; Pepino MY; Reed DR
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e216-22. PubMed ID: 15687429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene.
    Hayes JE; Bartoshuk LM; Kidd JR; Duffy VB
    Chem Senses; 2008 Mar; 33(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 18209019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taste phenotype associates with cardiovascular disease risk factors via diet quality in multivariate modeling.
    Sharafi M; Rawal S; Fernandez ML; Huedo-Medina TB; Duffy VB
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():103-112. PubMed ID: 29746892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
    Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference for and sensitivity to flavanol mean degree of polymerization in model wines is correlated with body composition.
    Griffin LE; Diako C; Miller LE; Neilson AP; Ross CF; Stewart AC
    Appetite; 2020 Jan; 144():104442. PubMed ID: 31494153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) or sucrose solutions and food preferences in young women.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():797-801. PubMed ID: 9929687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in liking for sweet and fatty foods following weight loss in women are related to prop phenotype but not to diet.
    Burgess B; Rao SP; Tepper BJ
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2016 Sep; 24(9):1867-73. PubMed ID: 27430708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
    Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-evaluating how sweet-liking and PROP-tasting are related.
    Yeomans MR; Vi C; Mohammed N; Armitage RM
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113702. PubMed ID: 35016967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Racial differences between African Americans and Asian Americans in the effect of 6-n-propylthiouracil taste intensity and food liking on body mass index.
    Choi SE
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 Jun; 114(6):938-944. PubMed ID: 24418005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.
    Chang WI; Chung JW; Kim YK; Chung SC; Kho HS
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 May; 51(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 16297856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women.
    Yackinous CA; Guinard JX
    Appetite; 2002 Jun; 38(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12071686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.
    Duffy VB; Peterson JM; Bartoshuk LM
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2-3):435-45. PubMed ID: 15276808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns.
    Spinelli S; Prescott J; Pierguidi L; Dinnella C; Arena E; Braghieri A; Di Monaco R; Gallina Toschi T; Endrizzi I; Proserpio C; Torri L; Monteleone E
    Nutrients; 2021 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33800789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.
    Dinehart ME; Hayes JE; Bartoshuk LM; Lanier SL; Duffy VB
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Feb; 87(2):304-13. PubMed ID: 16368118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.