BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18539388)

  • 1. Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes.
    Rezvanpour A; Roostaazad R; Hesampour M; Nyström M; Ghotbi C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1216-24. PubMed ID: 18539388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-performance thin-layer hydrogel composite membranes for ultrafiltration of natural organic matter.
    Susanto H; Ulbricht M
    Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2827-35. PubMed ID: 18342907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adsorption of amylase enzyme on ultrafiltration membranes.
    Beier SP; Enevoldsen AD; Kontogeorgis GM; Hansen EB; Jonsson G
    Langmuir; 2007 Aug; 23(18):9341-51. PubMed ID: 17676883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
    Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anti-fouling effect of bentonite suspension in ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsion.
    Panpanit S; Visvanathan C; Muttamara S
    Environ Technol; 2002 Mar; 23(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 11999987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separation of water from metal working emulsions by ultrafiltration using vibratory membranes.
    Moulai-Mostefa N; Frappart M; Akoum O; Ding L; Jaffrin MY
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):978-82. PubMed ID: 20097000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carbon nanotube blended polyethersulfone membranes for fouling control in water treatment.
    Celik E; Park H; Choi H; Choi H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):274-82. PubMed ID: 20716459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The substitution of sand filtration by immersed-UF for surface water treatment: pilot-scale studies.
    Lihua S; Xing L; Guoyu Z; Jie C; Zhe X; Guibai L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2337-43. PubMed ID: 19901465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the performance of prepared pristine and TiO
    Zhang T; Kong FX; Li XC; Liu Q; Chen JF; Guo CM
    Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 244():125386. PubMed ID: 32050321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performance.
    Gray SR; Ritchie CB; Tran T; Bolto BA
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3833-41. PubMed ID: 17618672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separation of oil/water emulsion using nano-particle (TiO(2)/Al(2)O(3)) modified PVDF ultrafiltration membranes and evaluation of fouling mechanism.
    Yi XS; Yu SL; Shi WX; Wang S; Jin LM; Sun N; Ma C; Sun LP
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 23202550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Water hammer reduces fouling during natural water ultrafiltration.
    Broens F; Menne D; Pothof I; Blankert B; Roesink HD; Futselaar H; Lammertink RG; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1113-20. PubMed ID: 22227242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of filtration characteristics in submerged microfiltration for drinking water treatment.
    Lee S; Park PK; Kim JH; Yeon KM; Lee CH
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3109-21. PubMed ID: 18387649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recovery of protein from poultry processing wastewater using membrane ultrafiltration.
    Lo YM; Cao D; Argin-Soysal S; Wang J; Hahm TS
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Apr; 96(6):687-98. PubMed ID: 15588771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harvesting algal biomass for biofuels using ultrafiltration membranes.
    Zhang X; Hu Q; Sommerfeld M; Puruhito E; Chen Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jul; 101(14):5297-304. PubMed ID: 20206502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.