177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18540217)
1. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
Alsop B; Jones BM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
McCarthy DC; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.
Sargisson RJ; White KG
Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 17918423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.
Nevin JA; Davison M; Odum AL; Shahan TA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):285-317. PubMed ID: 17970420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the development and mechanics of delayed matching-to-sample performance.
Kangas BD; Berry MS; Branch MN
J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Mar; 95(2):221-36. PubMed ID: 21541127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
García A; Benjumea S
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.
Arantes J; Machado A
J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 21541167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.
Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 7714448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
Kuroda T; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in a detection task.
Alsop B; Porritt M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 16602375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Directed forgetting of elements in compound samples.
Jitsumori M; Taneya J; Kikawa J
J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 1645098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
