These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers]. Lu J; Lü N; Huang Y; Li PS; Fisch H Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme. Zuvela E; Matson P Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct; 41(4):671-678. PubMed ID: 32843307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers. Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of chamber characteristics on the reliability of sperm concentration and movement measurements obtained by manual and videomicrographic analysis. Ginsburg KA; Armant DR Fertil Steril; 1990 May; 53(5):882-7. PubMed ID: 2332061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting]. Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated sperm concentration analysis with a new flow cytometry-based device, S-FCM. Tsuji T; Okada H; Fujisawa M; Hamaguchi Y; Kamidono S Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Mar; 117(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 11888079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated semen analysis shows an increase in sperm concentration and motility with time in Makler chambers having excess sample volume. Yanagida K; Hoshi K; Sato A; Burkman L Hum Reprod; 1990 Feb; 5(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 2324260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system]. Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy Evaluation of The Depth of Six Kinds of Sperm Counting Chambers for both Manual and Computer-Aided Semen Analyses. Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC Int J Fertil Steril; 2016; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 26985341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delay in the application of the cover glass is a potential source of error with the Makler Counting Chamber. Matson P; Irving J; Zuvela E; Hughes R Fertil Steril; 1999 Sep; 72(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 10519637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed covering causes the accumulation of motile sperm, leading to overestimation of sperm concentration and motility with a Makler counting chamber. Yu L; Cheng QY; Jia YL; Zheng Y; Yang TT; Wu YB; Li FP Asian J Androl; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39225004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration. Mahmoud AM; Depoorter B; Piens N; Comhaire FH Fertil Steril; 1997 Aug; 68(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 9240267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the accuracy of different sperm counting chambers by performing strict counts of photographed beads. Shiran E; Stoller J; Blumenfeld Z; Feigin PD; Makler A J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Aug; 12(7):434-42. PubMed ID: 8574071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Sperm parameters in 113 subjects after recent fatherhood did not correlate with WHO standards]. de los Ríos J; Cardona WD; Berdugo JA; Correa C; Arenas A; Olivera-Angel M; Peña RB; Cadavid AP Arch Esp Urol; 2004 Mar; 57(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 15074785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]