These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18541056)

  • 1. Evolutionary conservation of DNA-contact residues in DNA-binding domains.
    Chang YL; Tsai HK; Kao CY; Chen YC; Hu YJ; Yang JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 18541056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein-DNA interactions: amino acid conservation and the effects of mutations on binding specificity.
    Luscombe NM; Thornton JM
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Jul; 320(5):991-1009. PubMed ID: 12126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid evolution of the DNA-binding site in LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases.
    Lucas P; Otis C; Mercier JP; Turmel M; Lemieux C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Feb; 29(4):960-9. PubMed ID: 11160929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of evolutionary features for the identification of functionally important residues in major facilitator superfamily transporters.
    Jeon J; Yang JS; Kim S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Oct; 5(10):e1000522. PubMed ID: 19798434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlated evolutionary pressure at interacting transcription factors and DNA response elements can guide the rational engineering of DNA binding specificity.
    Raviscioni M; Gu P; Sattar M; Cooney AJ; Lichtarge O
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Jul; 350(3):402-15. PubMed ID: 15946684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GH101 family of glycoside hydrolases: subfamily structure and evolutionary connections with other families.
    Naumoff DG
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Jun; 8(3):437-51. PubMed ID: 20556855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of conserved features of LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases.
    Grishin A; Fonfara I; Alexeevski A; Spirin S; Zanegina O; Karyagina A; Alexeyevsky D; Wende W
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Jun; 8(3):453-69. PubMed ID: 20556856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting DNA-binding amino acid residues from electrostatic stabilization upon mutation to Asp/Glu and evolutionary conservation.
    Chen YC; Wu CY; Lim C
    Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):671-80. PubMed ID: 17340633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular characterization of STAT5A- and STAT5B-encoding genes reveals extended intragenic sequence homogeneity in cattle and mouse and different degrees of divergent evolution of various domains.
    Seyfert HM; Pitra C; Meyer L; Brunner RM; Wheeler TT; Molenaar A; McCracken JY; Herrmann J; Thiesen HJ; Schwerin M
    J Mol Evol; 2000 Jun; 50(6):550-61. PubMed ID: 10835485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequence-based prediction of DNA-binding residues in proteins with conservation and correlation information.
    Ma X; Guo J; Liu HD; Xie JM; Sun X
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(6):1766-75. PubMed ID: 22868682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A threading-based method for the prediction of DNA-binding proteins with application to the human genome.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Nov; 5(11):e1000567. PubMed ID: 19911048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA-binding residues and binding mode prediction with binding-mechanism concerned models.
    Huang YF; Huang CC; Liu YC; Oyang YJ; Huang CK
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Dec; 10 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S23. PubMed ID: 19958487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification and phylogeny of the MADS-box multigene family suggest defined roles of MADS-box gene subfamilies in the morphological evolution of eukaryotes.
    Theissen G; Kim JT; Saedler H
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Nov; 43(5):484-516. PubMed ID: 8875863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative footprinting of DNA-binding proteins.
    Contreras-Moreira B; Collado-Vides J
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e74-80. PubMed ID: 16873524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequence conservation of protein binding segments in intrinsically disordered regions.
    Ota H; Fukuchi S
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2017 Dec; 494(3-4):602-607. PubMed ID: 29066345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional dissection of the plant-specific SBP-domain: overlap of the DNA-binding and nuclear localization domains.
    Birkenbihl RP; Jach G; Saedler H; Huijser P
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Sep; 352(3):585-96. PubMed ID: 16095614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint evolutionary trees: a large-scale method to predict protein interfaces based on sequence sampling.
    Engelen S; Trojan LA; Sacquin-Mora S; Lavery R; Carbone A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jan; 5(1):e1000267. PubMed ID: 19165315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The conservation profile of a protein bears the imprint of the molecule that is evolutionarily coupled to the protein.
    Huang YW; Chang CM; Lee CW; Hwang JK
    Proteins; 2015 Aug; 83(8):1407-13. PubMed ID: 25846748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families.
    Lichtarge O; Bourne HR; Cohen FE
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Mar; 257(2):342-58. PubMed ID: 8609628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conservation and evolution in and among SRF- and MEF2-type MADS domains and their binding sites.
    Wu W; Huang X; Cheng J; Li Z; de Folter S; Huang Z; Jiang X; Pang H; Tao S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):501-11. PubMed ID: 20724380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.