These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1854106)

  • 41. A new slant on toric intraocular lens power calculation.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Ducoli P
    J Refract Surg; 2013 May; 29(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 23659233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cataract and keratoconus: minimizing complications in intraocular lens calculations.
    Bozorg S; Pineda R
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2014; 29(5-6):376-9. PubMed ID: 25325863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Performance of conventional biometry vs. integrated laser interferometry with keratometry device in intraocular lens measurement.
    Srivannaboon S; Tanehsakdi M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Nov; 90(11):2392-6. PubMed ID: 18181325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ray-tracing analysis of intraocular lens power in situ.
    Olsen T; Funding M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 22342009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients.
    Mehdizadeh M
    J AAPOS; 2008 Aug; 12(4):425; author reply 425-6. PubMed ID: 18708018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fluctuations in corneal curvature limit predictability of intraocular lens power calculations.
    Norrby S; Hirnschall N; Nishi Y; Findl O
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 23158678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the Astigmatic Power of Toric Intraocular Lenses Using Three Toric Calculators.
    Park HJ; Lee H; Woo YJ; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim HY; Kim TI
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jul; 56(4):1097-105. PubMed ID: 26069135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices.
    Rabsilber TM; Jepsen C; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 20152602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal.
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Küchle M; Naumann GO
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2162-7. PubMed ID: 14597524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Corneal biometrics of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).
    Zurawski CA; McCarey BE; van Rij G; Fernandes A
    J Med Primatol; 1989; 18(6):461-6. PubMed ID: 2614810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device.
    Shammas HJ; Chan S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1474-8. PubMed ID: 20692557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
    Tang Q; Hoffer KJ; Olson MD; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 19545808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of corneal astigmatism measurements of 2 optical biometer models for toric intraocular lens selection.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Feb; 41(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 25661130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Simulation of toric intraocular lens results: manual keratometry versus dual-zone automated keratometry from an integrated biometer.
    Hill W; Osher R; Cooke D; Solomon K; Sandoval H; Salas-Cervantes R; Potvin R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2181-7. PubMed ID: 22108112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Changes of corneal endothelium morphology and thickness after secondary intraocular lens implantation of traumatic aphakia].
    Li Q; Lin X; Lin H; Luo Y
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 23(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 17867513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Calculation of crystalline lens power in chickens with a customized version of Bennett's equation.
    Iribarren R; Rozema JJ; Schaeffel F; Morgan IG
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():33-8. PubMed ID: 24440810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intraocular lens power calculation for humanitarian missions based on partial biometry.
    Schmitz JW; Davis KD; McClatchey SK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1187-91. PubMed ID: 22608028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Characterising keratometry in different dog breeds using an automatic handheld keratometer.
    Kawasaki M; Furujo T; Kuroda K; Azuma K; Okamoto Y; Ito N
    Vet Rec; 2020 May; 186(15):e4. PubMed ID: 32123011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.