BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18541096)

  • 1. Advancing research through systematic reviews and meta-analysis: workshop experience.
    Alam AY; Zaidi Z; Rahim F; Qureshi AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 18541096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochrane systematic reviews of treatments for peripheral nerve disorders.
    Hughes RA; Jewitt KM; Swan AV
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2004 Sep; 9(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 15363058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clarification of study and citation.
    Finley PR; Bero L
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Dec; 167(22):2531; author reply 2531-2. PubMed ID: 18071185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cancer treatment reviews welcomes submission of the Cochrane Reviews.
    Pavlidis N; Stahel R; Clarke M; Djulbegovic B
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2006 Jun; 32(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 16713102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical considerations in meta-analysis.
    Barza M; Trikalinos TA; Lau J
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):195-210, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies.
    Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 18194387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research.
    Bhandari S
    Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to read a review paper.
    Callcut RA; Branson RD
    Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.
    Thomas J; Harden A; Oakley A; Oliver S; Sutcliffe K; Rees R; Brunton G; Kavanagh J
    BMJ; 2004 Apr; 328(7446):1010-2. PubMed ID: 15105329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
    Weir R; Bidwell S
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2843. PubMed ID: 18264210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis: indispensable tool or weapon of mass confusion?
    Clavert P; Duhamel A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Jun; 99(4):375-6. PubMed ID: 23622862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A practical guide to effective journal peer reviewing.
    Pietrzak WS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 20485095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Release of research results to the public].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Nov; 171(47):3419. PubMed ID: 19925724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Homeopathic research after the Lancet meta analysis--a moment for introspection.
    Oberbaum M; Singer SR; Frass M
    Complement Ther Med; 2005 Dec; 13(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 16338202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.