These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18541282)

  • 1. Eye dominance effects in conjunction search.
    Shneor E; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1592-602. PubMed ID: 18541282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye dominance effects in feature search.
    Shneor E; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4258-69. PubMed ID: 17014886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absence of binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning effects in color discrimination.
    Costa MF; Ventura DF; Perazzolo F; Murakoshi M; Silveira LC
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):461-9. PubMed ID: 16961981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
    Kamphuisen AP; van Wezel RJ; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical evidence for a purely binocular color system.
    Shimono K; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 18957305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
    Lee SH; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):983-91. PubMed ID: 15031091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
    Knapen T; Paffen C; Kanai R; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17083956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry.
    Knapen T; Kanai R; Brascamp J; van Boxtel J; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3269-75. PubMed ID: 17950397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of attention on the VEP in binocular and monocular conditions.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 1293531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
    O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception.
    Bruggeman H; Yonas A; Konczak J
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1420-6. PubMed ID: 17166526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of binocular and monocular distractors on saccades in participants with normal binocular vision.
    Griffiths H; Whittle J; Buckley D
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):72-81. PubMed ID: 16246393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature head-start: Conjunction search following progressive feature disclosure.
    Olds ES; Graham TJ; Jones JA
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1428-47. PubMed ID: 19236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular and binocular reading performance in subjects with normal binocular vision.
    Johansson J; Pansell T; Ygge J; Seimyr GÖ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jul; 97(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 24612111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye dominance and response latency in area V1 of the monkey.
    Romero MC; Castro AF; Bermudez MA; Perez R; Gonzalez F
    Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(5):757-61. PubMed ID: 17915042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallactic movement beats binocularity in the presence of external visual noise.
    Voges N; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul; 32(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 22697215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between binocular rivalry and Gestalt formation.
    de Weert CM; Snoeren PR; Koning A
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2571-9. PubMed ID: 15893786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.