These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18541434)

  • 1. Monte Carlo calculations of electrons in aluminum.
    Aydin A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Feb; 67(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 18541434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backscattering coefficients for low energy positrons and electrons impinging on bulk solid targets.
    Bentabet A; Fenineche N
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2009 Mar; 21(9):095403. PubMed ID: 21817389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detailed Monte Carlo Simulation of electron transport and electron energy loss spectra.
    Attarian Shandiz M; Salvat F; Gauvin R
    Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):475-491. PubMed ID: 26512795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inelastic scattering and stopping power of low-energy electrons (0.01-10 keV) in toluene.
    García G; Blanco F; Grau Carles A; Grau Malonda A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004; 60(2-4):481-5. PubMed ID: 14987689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo study of absorbed dose distributions in both the vapor and liquid phases of water by intermediate energy electrons based on different condensed-history transport schemes.
    Bousis C; Emfietzoglou D; Hadjidoukas P; Nikjoo H
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(14):3739-61. PubMed ID: 18574312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electron inelastic mean free path formula and CSDA-range calculation in biological compounds for low and intermediate energies.
    Akar A; Gümüş H; Okumuşoğlu NT
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 May; 64(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 16388951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of the semi-classical approach for calculation of the surface excitation parameter.
    Da B; Mao SF; Ding ZJ
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2011 Oct; 23(39):395003. PubMed ID: 21918291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positron follow-up in liquid water: I. A new Monte Carlo track-structure code.
    Champion C; Le Loirec C
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1707-23. PubMed ID: 16552099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positron backscattering from solid targets: Modeling of scattering processes via various approaches.
    Kribaa B; Rouabah Z; Loirec CL; Champion C; Bouarissa N
    Micron; 2016 Aug; 87():46-50. PubMed ID: 27200485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subcellular S-factors for low-energy electrons: a comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and continuous-slowing-down calculations.
    Emfietzoglou D; Kostarelos K; Hadjidoukas P; Bousis C; Fotopoulos A; Pathak A; Nikjoo H
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Dec; 84(12):1034-44. PubMed ID: 19061127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulation of electron backscattering from compounds with low mean atomic number.
    Howell PG; Boyde A
    Scanning; 1998 Jan; 20(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9493414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model calculation of coherence effects in the elastic backscattering of very low energy electrons (1-20 eV) from amorphous ice.
    Liljequist D
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):50-3. PubMed ID: 21615241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculation of the surface excitation parameter for Si and Ge from measured electron backscattered spectra by means of a Monte-Carlo simulation.
    Orosz GT; Sulyok A; Gergely G; Gurbán S; Menyhard M
    Microsc Microanal; 2003 Aug; 9(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12901769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An accurate approximation for the highly efficient sampling of polar scattering angle of electron elastic single-scattering events.
    Pasciak AS; Ford JR
    Scanning; 2006; 28(6):333-41. PubMed ID: 17181135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. R-matrix calculation of low-energy electron collisions with uracil.
    Dora A; Tennyson J; Bryjko L; van Mourik T
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Apr; 130(16):164307. PubMed ID: 19405579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SU-E-T-489: Quantum versus Classical Trajectory Monte Carlo Simulations of Low Energy Electron Transport.
    Thomson R; Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3817-3818. PubMed ID: 28517446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radial secondary electron dose profiles and biological effects in light-ion beams based on analytical and Monte Carlo calculations using distorted wave cross sections.
    Wiklund K; Olivera GH; Brahme A; Lind BK
    Radiat Res; 2008 Jul; 170(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 18582149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inelastic mean free path data for Si corrected for surface excitation.
    Orosz GT; Gergely G; Gurbán S; Menyhard M; Jablonski A
    Microsc Microanal; 2005 Dec; 11(6):581-5. PubMed ID: 17481337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Auger effect in physical and biological research.
    Nikjoo H; Emfietzoglou D; Charlton DE
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Dec; 84(12):1011-26. PubMed ID: 19061125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte Carlo study of cellular S-factors for 1 keV to 1 MeV electrons.
    Bousis C; Emfietzoglou D; Hadjidoukas P; Nikjoo H
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(16):5023-38. PubMed ID: 19652289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.