94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18541451)
1. Subjective evaluation of a novel method of dose reduction by optical re-exposure of conventional radiographs - a multi-observer region of interest evaluation in an animal model.
Paech A; Schulz AP; Seide K; Faschingbauer M; Jürgens Ch
Phys Med; 2008 Dec; 24(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 18541451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical evaluation of a new technique for X-ray dose reduction: measurement of signal-to-noise ratio and modulation transfer function in an animal model.
Paech A; Schulz AP; Hahlbrauck B; Kiene J; Wenzl ME; Jürgens Ch
Phys Med; 2007 Mar; 23(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 17568541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography using low tube voltage of 80 kV in subjects with normal body mass indices: comparative study using 120 kV.
Jun BR; Yong HS; Kang EY; Woo OH; Choi EJ
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1099-106. PubMed ID: 23034796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose.
Kordolaimi SD; Argentos S; Pantos I; Kelekis NL; Efstathopoulos EP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 24270114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.
Tingberg A; Eriksson F; Medin J; Besjakov J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Sandborg M; Almén A; Lanhede B; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 15933082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of postprocessed low-dose radiographs in skeletal imaging.
Kolck J; Ziegeler K; Walter-Rittel T; Hermann KGA; Hamm B; Beck A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210881. PubMed ID: 34919419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model.
Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt (kV)-selection in computed tomography of the chest: effects on radiation exposure and image quality.
Eller A; Wuest W; Scharf M; Brand M; Achenbach S; Uder M; Lell MM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2386-91. PubMed ID: 24050878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging dose management using multi-resolution in CT-guided radiation therapy.
Sheng K; Jeraj R; Shaw R; Mackie TR; Paliwal BR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1205-19. PubMed ID: 15798317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
Borgen L; Kalra MK; Laerum F; Hachette IW; Fredriksson CH; Sandborg M; Smedby O
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging.
Gravel P; Després P; Beaudoin G; de Guise JA
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of an automatic dose control system for CT: patient studies.
Stumpp P; Gosch D; Kühn A; Sorge I; Weber D; Lehmkuhl L; Kahn T; Nagel HD
Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 23108902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.
Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Added value of integrated circuit detector in head CT: objective and subjective image quality in comparison to conventional detector design.
Korn A; Bender B; Spira D; Schabel C; Bhadelia R; Claussen C; Ernemann U; Brodoefel H
Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1506-11. PubMed ID: 25201378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
