These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1854206)
1. Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik. Olson BH; Clark DL; Milner BB; Stewart MH; Wolfe RL Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 May; 57(5):1535-9. PubMed ID: 1854206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of commercial 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide preparations with the Standard Methods membrane filtration fecal coliform test for the detection of Escherichia coli in water samples. Clark DL; Milner BB; Stewart MH; Wolfe RL; Olson BH Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 May; 57(5):1528-34. PubMed ID: 1854205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of membrane filtration and Autoanalysis Colilert presence-absence techniques for analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking water samples. Lewis CM; Mak JL Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Dec; 55(12):3091-4. PubMed ID: 2694959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique. Franzblau SG; Hinnebusch BJ; Kelley LM; Sinclair NA Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 48(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6383216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches. Rompré A; Servais P; Baudart J; de-Roubin MR; Laurent P J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Mar; 49(1):31-54. PubMed ID: 11777581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples. Hörman A; Hänninen ML Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(17):3249-56. PubMed ID: 16916531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern sweden. Eckner KF Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 64(8):3079-83. PubMed ID: 9687478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chlorine injury and the comparative performance of Colisure (TM), ColiLert (TM) and ColiQuik (TM) for the enumeration of coliform bacteria and E.coli in drinking water. McFeters GA; Pyle BH; Gillis SJ; Acomb CJ; Ferrazza D Water Sci Technol; 1993; 27(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11537608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water. Tobin RS; Lomax P; Kushner DJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 1980 Aug; 40(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 7469407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques. Edberg SC; Allen MJ; Smith DB Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Apr; 55(4):1003-8. PubMed ID: 2658802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. False-positive coliform reaction mediated by Aeromonas in the Colilert defined substrate technology system. Landre JP; Gavriel AA; Lamb AJ Lett Appl Microbiol; 1998 May; 26(5):352-4. PubMed ID: 9674164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial water quality in the personal water bottles of elementary students. Oliphant JA; Ryan MC; Chu A Can J Public Health; 2002; 93(5):366-7. PubMed ID: 12353459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A long-term study comparing membrane filtration with Colilert defined substrates in detecting fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in natural waters. Buckalew DW; Hartman LJ; Grimsley GA; Martin AE; Register KM J Environ Manage; 2006 Aug; 80(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16338057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Drinking water test methods in crisis-afflicted areas: comparison of methods under field conditions. Merle R; Bleul I; Schulenburg J; Kreienbrock L; Klein G Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2011 Nov; 8(11):1185-9. PubMed ID: 21854264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two methods for evaluating the quality of stored drinking water in Abidjan, Côte d'lvoire, and review of other comparisons in the literature. Macy JT; Dunne EF; Angoran-Benie YH; Kamelan-Tano Y; Kouadio L; Djai KA; Luby SP J Water Health; 2005 Sep; 3(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 16209026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Colilert and Enterolert defined substrate methodology for wastewater applications. Yakub GP; Castric DA; Stadterman-Knauer KL; Tobin MJ; Blazina M; Heineman TN; Yee GY; Frazier L Water Environ Res; 2002; 74(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 12043969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Clark's presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples. Pipes WO; Minnigh HA; Moyer B; Troy MA Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 Sep; 52(3):439-43. PubMed ID: 3532953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems. Jacobs NJ; Zeigler WL; Reed FC; Stukel TA; Rice EW Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 May; 51(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 3524452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms. Covert TC; Shadix LC; Rice EW; Haines JR; Freyberg RW Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 55(10):2443-7. PubMed ID: 2513773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Membrane filtration differentiation of E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water. Mates A; Shaffer M J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Sep; 67(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 2693426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]